We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2166
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the Hobratsis Respublikis Prezidenti (President of the Hobrazian Republic) chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Left Communist Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the We Say So! Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Left Communist Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Hobrazian Peoples Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the We Say So! Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Left Communist Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the We Say So! Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the We Say So! Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:35:10, January 04, 2006 CET | From |  Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166 |
| Message | You may be a few votes short...That's a shame. 206 votes is needed I believe, and you can only get 204. |
| Date | 17:29:40, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166 |
| Message | If it is 50% + 1 vote this proposal needs 201 votes. If it is 51% this proposal needs 204 votes. Why should you need 206 votes or 55% which would be 220 votes? |
| Date | 17:34:40, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166 |
| Message | I don't know the exact percentage. ...christ.. I just know it's more than 204 votes. |
| Date | 17:39:41, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166 |
| Message | the wiki says 50% and in the details listed in this proposal says: more than half of the legislature, but i'll guess we just have to wait and see. Hoping the other parties in the proposal will vote in favour of this cabinet :-) |
| Date | 18:13:24, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166 |
| Message | It will a dark day for Hobrazia if they do. Joining a cabinet with an avowed fascist, I hope they don't cross over to the darkside.. |
| Date | 19:35:27, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166 |
| Message | 201 votes should do it, check this: http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4384&mforum=particracy |
| Date | 02:01:32, January 05, 2006 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166 |
| Message | I admit to finding myself in a quandry over this. Though I increase my share in cabinet (a good thing!) we would've liked for the L-PU to continue in their current position of Foreign Minister. We disagree vehemently on almost every part of national policy, but we consider their expertise in this field invaluable...hmm... |
| Date | 02:10:10, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166 |
| Message | We share closer foreign policy ideas , which is more beneficial in a cabinet. Our national policy differences are not much of a conflict due to our cabinet posistions. |
| Date | 02:28:53, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166 |
| Message | Moderate internationalist and isolationist leaning is surely close foreign policy ideas. HPP cannot understand if WSS!P ally up with L-PU! |
| Date | 03:29:52, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the HPPs Cabinet Proposal of April 2166 |
| Message | You got greedy I guess.. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 160 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 196 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 44 |
| Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
| Random quote: "The man who prefers his country before any other duty shows the same spirit as the man who surrenders every right to the state. They both deny that right is superior to authority." - John Dalberg-Acton |