We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Act for the Suppression of the Seditious "Post-Rational" School of Philosophy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hausu Serujaku-Rabuzubāgu
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3800
Description[?]:
| This subversive school of philosophers must be rooted out of our hallowed universities and maid cafes alike. This nihilist, incomprehensible position is corrupting our youth. Hereby the Imperial Throne will take direct measures to prevent the spread of this intellectual plague by all means necessary. We also ban all other philosophies and art movements described as "post" anything, as they are clearly a front for post-rationalism |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding regulation of media content.
Old value:: There are laws against the publication of false information and hate speech.
Current: There are laws against the publication of false information and hate speech.
Proposed: It is forbidden to criticize the government, or publish any material that the government does not approve of.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:30:12, February 11, 2015 CET | From |  Hausu Hākuānen-Rasōrisukubai | To | Debating the Act for the Suppression of the Seditious "Post-Rational" School of Philosophy |
| Message | His Industrious Excellency concurs. |
| Date | 22:32:00, February 11, 2015 CET | From | Hausu Serujaku-Rabuzubāgu | To | Debating the Act for the Suppression of the Seditious "Post-Rational" School of Philosophy |
| Message | Clearly freedom of speech has gone too far, and is undermining the every basis of reality. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 640 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "If we were to wake up some morning and find that everyone was the same race, creed and color, we would find some other causes for prejudice by noon." - George Aiken |