Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5476
Next month in: 00:26:00
Server time: 07:33:59, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Environment Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Red Arglon-Hulbark Liberation Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2054

Description[?]:

To save the land for our children, the people of Hulbark wish for this!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:45:21, May 17, 2005 CET
From Deadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Environment Act
MessageHmmm, yeah We'd go for that we think.

Date18:30:35, May 17, 2005 CET
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the Environment Act
Message@HLF: Please stop talking as if you know what the people of Hulbark want as long as you don't represent them properly :)

Against, while I believe that nature is important it's not good to have national parks. I prefer foundations that get some government funding.

Date19:20:58, May 17, 2005 CET
From Deadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Environment Act
MessageEspecially since none of HLF's seats came from Hulbark, all from Arglon IIRC.

Date19:25:32, May 17, 2005 CET
From Red Arglon-Hulbark Liberation Front
ToDebating the Environment Act
MessageI do what the opinion bars say

Date22:28:40, May 17, 2005 CET
From Libertarian Party of Valruzia
ToDebating the Environment Act
MessageYou aren't saving the land. You're denying people it by making it a useless national park, whose land could be used for housing for the people of Hulbark.

Date00:39:14, May 18, 2005 CET
From Deadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Environment Act
MessageYou cant turn the whole place into an urban jungle. Kids need somewhere to play, some people need somewhere nice to walk their dogs. An odd park here and there looks nicer than a block of flats.

Date00:40:23, May 18, 2005 CET
From Deadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Environment Act
MessageAnd HLF, this is the reason you shouldnt put bills straight to vote. Some time to debate is needed.

Date01:20:46, May 18, 2005 CET
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the Environment Act
Message@HLF: You say that you do what the opinion bars say. But the people of hulbark are skeptic about the environment.

OOC: Don't take it personal, I hope you enjoy this game :)

Date04:20:10, May 18, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the Environment Act
MessageWe have no real problems with this, so long as it is limited and maintained.

Date12:47:39, May 18, 2005 CET
From Libertarian Party of Valruzia
ToDebating the Environment Act
MessageAn odd park here and there doesn't need to be an entire national park. Local governments can fund local parks.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 54

no
  

Total Seats: 85

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda.

    Random quote: "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius, and a lot of courage, to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71