We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Paramilitary Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Nationalist Fraction
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3809
Description[?]:
| Paramilitaries should be allowed again. They can be a very good aid to law enforcement. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government's position on paramilitaries.
Old value:: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Current: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Proposed: Paramilitaries are allowed but are heavily regulated by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:20:23, February 27, 2015 CET | From | People of Freedom (P.F) | To | Debating the Paramilitary Bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker. Our view on paramilitaries existing is either a yes or a no. Not maybe. We will oppose current. Amy Lane DRP National Spokesperson |
| Date | 22:32:41, February 27, 2015 CET | From | Federal Liberal Congress | To | Debating the Paramilitary Bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We share the opinion of our DRP Colleagues. We would add that for us to consider supporting the existence of paramilitary organizations, there would need to be heavy regulations concerning their operation and power. Francis M. Jones V Chairman of the FLC |
| Date | 22:45:34, February 27, 2015 CET | From | FJS Freedom, Justice, Sustainability | To | Debating the Paramilitary Bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We might be open to this, but need more information on how and for what purpose these paramilitaries would operate and how they would be regulated. James Powers Minister of Defence |
| Date | 23:01:30, February 27, 2015 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Paramilitary Bill |
| Message | colleagues, we are willing to change the proposal to heavily regulated organisation. That would mean that paramilitary groups potentially would have more powers than they would have with our proposal. Answering Mr. Powers' question: in our proposal paramilitary groups would be used as a security force for political rallies, securing political areas, etcetera... LNC has used paramilitaries for years for securing their people and buildings. Ludwig Murphy LNC chairman |
| Date | 01:42:12, February 28, 2015 CET | From |  Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Paramilitary Bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, If paramilitaries will be allowed to exist, they will need to be recognised and regulated. If we allow them to exist without officially acknowledging them, we can't regulate them and we'll end up with gangs taking over the country. -- Andre Fertig, Chairman of the GNRG |
| Date | 07:56:02, February 28, 2015 CET | From | FJS Freedom, Justice, Sustainability | To | Debating the Paramilitary Bill |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Why do political rallies need a security force? Elizabeth Blind Minister of Justice |
| Date | 12:22:09, February 28, 2015 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Paramilitary Bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, we have had problems on political rallies in the past. Apparently, not everyone agrees with party politics. Jonathan Geel LNC spokesman |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 259 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 340 |
| Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "The decadent international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the goods." - John Maynard Keynes |