We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private Property Security Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lutte Féministe de Libération
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2169
Description[?]:
| The government should never steal a person's land. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:50:33, January 07, 2006 CET | From | Proletariat Coalition | To | Debating the Private Property Security Act |
| Message | Against. |
| Date | 12:19:50, January 07, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Private Property Security Act |
| Message | Same as the Proletariat Coalition said. |
| Date | 18:22:35, January 07, 2006 CET | From |  Parti Citron de Rildanor | To | Debating the Private Property Security Act |
| Message | Same as both before me |
| Date | 01:18:45, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the Private Property Security Act |
| Message | Any reason why? A man's house is his castle. The government should not be able to take away someone's house they've worked all their life to build and perfect. It's a crime. |
| Date | 19:24:03, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Private Property Security Act |
| Message | Sometimes there are bigger issues at stake than a man and his castle. If we need to build a dam to prevent floods and save people and wildlife alike then why shouldn't we? If we need to build defences to prepare this country for war and to better protect the people of Rildanor then why shouldn't we? WE SHOULD, WE CAN, AND WE NEED TO. |
| Date | 03:24:17, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the Private Property Security Act |
| Message | I see your point. Nevertheless I'm going to move this to vote and vote for. |
| Date | 05:05:47, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Private Property Security Act |
| Message | Changed my mind. :P |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 23 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 62 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 15 |
| Random fact: Real-life religions should not be referenced in Particracy. Terra has its own religions, many of which mirror real-life ones. See: http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Illustrated_Catalogue_of_Religion |
| Random quote: "The day is not far off when the economic problem will take the back seat where it belongs, and the arena of the heart and the head will be occupied or reoccupied, by our real problems, the problems of life and of human relations, of creation and behaviour and religion." - John Maynard Keynes |