Bill: Improve Democracy
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3812
Old value:: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Current: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Proposed: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
|Date||14:20:36, March 03, 2015 CET||From||Lodamese Nationalist Committee||To||Debating the Improve Democracy|
changing our current structure would only make things more difficult. Lodamun has known its current system for ages and it seems to me that it needs no changes.
|Date||14:34:05, March 03, 2015 CET||From||Great National Republican Guard||To||Debating the Improve Democracy|
Many parties have tried to change this, and all have failed for 3 centuries. I do not see how this improves Democracy. Also, there are currently no proposed title changes for the head of state or head of government.
Chairman of the GNRG
|Date||17:49:18, March 03, 2015 CET||From||FJS Freedom, Justice, Sustainability||To||Debating the Improve Democracy|
With all due respect, we really see no need for this to change.
|Date||13:52:56, March 06, 2015 CET||From||Lodamun Justice Tahreek||To||Debating the Improve Democracy|
I would like all the parties to vote in the favour of the bill. If they have any concerns, they should contact us later.
Lodamum Justice Tahreek
|Date||14:13:49, March 06, 2015 CET||From||Great National Republican Guard||To||Debating the Improve Democracy|
I already pointed out a flaw in the bill; no titles have been suggested for the head of state and head of government. The LJT has also failed to tell us how this will improve Democracy, and they demonstrate a lack of understanding for Lodamun's political system.
Other parties have already rejected this proposal, and the LJT's President is going to say that we should contact him "later" while voting in favour of the bill. What the hell is this? We expressed concerns, and he should have asked other parties about their concerns before putting the bill to vote.
Chairman of the GNRG
|Date||17:23:35, March 06, 2015 CET||From||People of Freedom (P.F)||To||Debating the Improve Democracy|
|Message||Mr . Speaker. |
This bill is flawed as the GNRG have stated. As their are no titles and no explanation has been given???
Leader of the NDP
|Date||23:42:42, March 06, 2015 CET||From||Federal Liberal Congress||To||Debating the Improve Democracy|
|Message||Mr. Speaker, |
The FLC sees no merit in this proposal. We will stand with our coalition partners in preserving the current system.
President GDR Lodamun.
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Total Seats: 267
Total Seats: 332
Total Seats: 0
|Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.|
|Random quote: "Sometimes democracy must be bathed in blood." – Augusto Pinochet|