Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5473
Next month in: 01:02:36
Server time: 14:57:23, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): albaniansunited | burgerboys | lulus | Mbites2 | rezins | RogueALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Farm Size Localization Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Green Party (FGP)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3814

Description[?]:

The purpose of this bill is to maintain the current stance that the national government does not interfere in the size of farms. It is also designed to recognize that local government should be free to make regulations and laws regarding farms within their jurisdiction.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:17:25, March 12, 2015 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Farm Size Localization Reform
Message"Smaller farmers that produce farmers markets and products that have a home grown feel are great for our economy. In some areas, this happens naturally. In others, regulation might be a necessary evil. Obviously, regulation from a national level is evil usually, but from a local level, this makes sense. We will compromise here and vote for this."

~Ted Johnson, Head Chairman of the LPS

Date21:16:07, March 12, 2015 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Farm Size Localization Reform
Message"We have asked the LPSGC (Libertarian Party of Solentia Grassroots Convention) to take a poll on this issue, and even though many of them are small farm. They voted against this. 60% against, 40% for. The people have spoken, and we vote nay. I personally liked this bill, but we are a peoples party."

~Ted Johnson, Head Chairman of the LPS

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 228

no
    

Total Seats: 197

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - Howard Zinn

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 43