We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Social Responsibility Act 3817
Details
Submitted by[?]: Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3818
Description[?]:
| Proposer: Astryd Goldsea, Unionist Leader |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion policies are established by local governments
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Proposed: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning crossdressing.
Current: Crossdressing is prohibited by the state.
Proposed: Crossdressing is allowed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The legality of interracial sex.
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning interracial sex.
Current: Interracial sex is legal.
Proposed: Interracial sex is legal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:59:19, March 18, 2015 CET | From |  Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Social Responsibility Act 3817 |
| Message | "Why does the government have to proclaim legalization? If legalization isn't proclaimed, it's still legal, but the government will not be tempted to regulate or eliminate these rights. Also, nationalizing abortion is a stupid idea. Too many people are against it for the national government to claim that it is legal for everyone. What if the government starts forcing abortions in certain situations? That'd be quite terrible." ~Donny Kennedy, Secondary Chairman of the LPS |
| Date | 03:34:11, March 19, 2015 CET | From | Federal Green Party (FGP) | To | Debating the Social Responsibility Act 3817 |
| Message | The Reform Option is deeply committed to the values of Federalism. There are very few bills that we would consider voting for that centralize power. As far as these other areas, we have to agree with the LPS on this one. What benefit is there to legalizing these areas formally? If they are already de-facto legal then there doesn't appear to be a change to the status of crossdressing or interracial sex by proclaiming legality. -Christy Bell, Head Speaker of the Reform Option Council |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 37 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 488 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: "They can call us communists and fascists all they want but, their words are of a hollow ring with the blood of innocence at their feet." - Mathew Jameson, former Hutorian politician |