Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 02:09:07
Server time: 01:50:52, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Restoration Act 3818

Details

Submitted by[?]: Coalition for National Unity [CNU]

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3819

Description[?]:

"I did not imagine that within a single generation, we would need to be fighting to save our Republic twice. Twice our Republic has been dismantled by anarchists in the last 50 years. Now, however, as always, the Unionists shall protect her. Four restorations under our belt across 1200 years- we can do this once more! For the Republic!"

Astryd Goldsea, Unionist Leader

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:34:25, March 20, 2015 CET
From Free Democratic Party
ToDebating the Restoration Act 3818
Message"Absolutely not!"

~Ted Johnson, Head Chairman of the LPS and Prime Minister

Date20:38:17, March 20, 2015 CET
From Federal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the Restoration Act 3818
MessageWhat's wrong with the current titles?

Date14:57:23, March 21, 2015 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Restoration Act 3818
Message"They make no cultural sense. At all. They are literally pulled from nowhere."

Astryd Goldsea, Unionist Leader

ooc: It's incredibly bad RolePlaying to continuously place real-life terms that have no in-game baring in and replace 7 years of players' construction of Solentia's culture just because you don't like the names. It's bad enough not engaging in roleplay but actively destroying what many players have worked very hard to build and protect is just bad sportsmanship.

Date00:29:18, March 22, 2015 CET
From Federal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the Restoration Act 3818
MessageOOC:

Maybe you could make that claim for the Senate Warden position, but how would President be a name that does not make sense? We have stripped many powers away from the Supreme President and as such it seems reasonable to rename the title to President. One example is that all parties can now propose a cabinet.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 225

no
    

Total Seats: 300

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda.

Random quote: "I never dared to be radical when young. For fear it would make me conservative when old." - Robert Frost

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58