We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Resolution to Back the Pontesi Gaming Commission
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2182
Description[?]:
| I am asking for full government support of the Pontesi Betting Ring so trib doesn't feel exploited ; ) http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4445&mforum=particracy I think it will spur intrest in Pontesi's elections. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:21:51, January 08, 2006 CET | From | SeeYainHell Party | To | Debating the Resolution to Back the Pontesi Gaming Commission |
| Message | I don't feel that exploited, I just don't like the odds you gave me :( Do'y got some inside info? ;) |
| Date | 15:22:15, January 08, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Resolution to Back the Pontesi Gaming Commission |
| Message | Good idea THEM. |
| Date | 21:37:10, January 08, 2006 CET | From |  Pnték Znkak Prta 'Bastardry' | To | Debating the Resolution to Back the Pontesi Gaming Commission |
| Message | No objections here. |
| Date | 01:06:45, January 09, 2006 CET | From | THEM | To | Debating the Resolution to Back the Pontesi Gaming Commission |
| Message | Well the first round has been sort of a flop :p |
| Date | 04:26:04, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Pontesi Imperial Alliance | To | Debating the Resolution to Back the Pontesi Gaming Commission |
| Message | The Pontesi Imperial Alliance supports this system. [OOC] Unless, our nation should vote to ban gambling, of course :)[/OOC] |
| Date | 23:55:32, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Friedrich Hayek Party | To | Debating the Resolution to Back the Pontesi Gaming Commission |
| Message | supported |
| Date | 22:12:29, February 06, 2006 CET | From | THEM | To | Debating the Resolution to Back the Pontesi Gaming Commission |
| Message | I should do this again sometime when I'm not being lazy. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 190 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 27 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 82 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." - Bill Clinton |