We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ownership of defense industry
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Revolutionist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3825
Description[?]:
| Mr speaker, State must own defense industries.Private ownership on such affairs must be entirely dropped .Military and defense is matter of the entire state,not an individual benefit Bruce Nebula Legislative Lead of CRP |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns all defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:34:39, April 01, 2015 CET | From | People of Freedom (P.F) | To | Debating the Ownership of defense industry |
| Message | Mr. Speaker. You wish to burden and close the market in this vital industry. Close the door on ideas and freedom whilst you at it. Amy Lane M.P |
| Date | 02:11:20, April 01, 2015 CET | From | Red Party | To | Debating the Ownership of defense industry |
| Message | Mr. Speaker We will support this bill. |
| Date | 05:19:49, April 01, 2015 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Ownership of defense industry |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, on several occasions the Defence department has been helped out by our defence industries. We also get a lot in return. By investing in new weaponry we create jobs and stimulate other branches of the industry. For example, MIL still is privately owned, but does everything it can to deliver us essential materials in no time. Evelyn Sanders Minister of Defence |
| Date | 06:29:46, April 01, 2015 CET | From | Communist Revolutionist Party | To | Debating the Ownership of defense industry |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Dear Evelyn,as a defence minister you mentioned the private owners are very friendly,but i cannot trust.However regulated it is..we cannot still trust.Who will answer if something went wrong?They?The individuals?No..they cannot,the nation will have to carry its burden.I'am not saying that state owned industries do not have problems,but yet it will not become a burden if they committed a mistake,it will become a accident,mistake,which people trust..Why can't we just invest on our own industries,where we can plan with our society,where no exploitation takes place.... And i don't want to respond on the '"freedom" talk by P.F.I think wiser people will know why Bruce Nebula President General of CRP |
| Date | 07:22:14, April 01, 2015 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Ownership of defense industry |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, in general, LNC is in favor of state owned industries. But we also realize that the state hardly can do the whole lot. We believe that there needs to be the possibility for private enterprises. And where does defence industry start or end? MIL for example is a pure military industry factory. Their major supplier is SSF, a steel factory. In some way SSF also is partial defence industry. Ludwig Murphy LNC chairman vice-President of Lodamun |
| Date | 07:47:47, April 01, 2015 CET | From | Communist Revolutionist Party | To | Debating the Ownership of defense industry |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Thats true Ludwig,we need to discuss about that.Hmm..we can' agree with private ownership of defence,but we have immense amount of budget spent for defence.Lets utilize it..we can also open a new branch under the Military for to reduce the over work of Government.But our current budget says,state ownership will not become a burden or over work to the state. Alonso Chief secretary of CRP(Golavia) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 188 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 173 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 238 |
| Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
| Random quote: "Abortion is inherently different from other medical procedures because no other procedure involves the purposeful termination of a potential life." - Potter Stewart |