We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Power Ban Bill
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3832
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: Nuclear power plants are not permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:20:49, April 14, 2015 CET | From | Guglib Jeongchi Yeonhab | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Ban Bill |
Message | The Kyo are a rational and scientific-minded people who do share the superstitions of Oegukin environmentalist pagans about nuclear energy. Handled responsibly, nuclear power is perfectly safe. Relying on high-polluting fossil fuels is actually far more dangerous in the long run. Jeong Jin Ji Party Chairman |
Date | 18:42:18, April 14, 2015 CET | From | Coalición | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Ban Bill |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We propose that we cease using nuclear power, which is extremely dangerous and expensive. Furthermore, our reliance on fossil fuels should also be cut dramaticall. Instead this country should be building a country reliant on clean and renewable energy. Merfyn Jenkins, Co-leader (GP) |
Date | 20:37:04, April 14, 2015 CET | From | Guglib Jeongchi Yeonhab | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Ban Bill |
Message | Mr. Speaker, I am curious to learn how Mr. Jenkins intends to generate renewable energy in anywhere near the quantities that would be needed to meet our energy requirements. The technology just isn't advanced enough to achieve that. Jeong Jin Ji Party Chairman |
Date | 01:46:33, April 15, 2015 CET | From | Plaid Hôb / Partido de la esperanza | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Ban Bill |
Message | Mr Siaradwr, Mr Jeong makes a valid point: people must learn to live more sustainably and consume less energy. Not the least if he is right about hazardous nuclear power, a threat to our children and their descendants for 10,000 years forward, is what's needed to maintain the current level of consumerist decadence. Morganna Fahramar, Headmistress (PH) |
Date | 11:34:15, April 15, 2015 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Ban Bill |
Message | Mr Speaker, banning nuclear power will increase our dependence on foreign providers of fossil fuels, in the worst case leaving us at the mercy of foreign oil-producing dictatorships. It is naive to believe that we can kick-start the recovery our economy so desperately needs solely through half-finished renewable energy concepts, which will never satisfy the demands of our industry. YANG Sung-nam DUP Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
no | Total Seats: 750 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
Random quote: "The great economic, social and political scientist, Karlstein Metz, accurately predicted over 2,500 years ago that capitalism is doomed to destruction by its inherent weaknesses and contradictions, and must inevitably be replaced by a communist form of social, political and economic organisation." - Friedrich Pfeiffer, former Dorvish politician |