We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Lowering the Retirement Age ti 65 (Again)
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3842
Description[?]:
| Recently, we successfully lowered the age of retirement to 65, this made Luthori a far more fair nation towards our hardworking people. However, the recent Liberal Alliance Reforms increased it to an outrageous 70 once again. Choice cannot stand by and watch as this unfairness continues and we DEMAND the age of retirement is once again lowered to the much more fair age of 65. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 70
Current: 67
Proposed: 65
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:21:33, May 05, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Lowering the Retirement Age ti 65 (Again) |
| Message | Parties that have voted no, I can't believe you think the retirement age should be so high, 70 is outrageous. Especially as people in this country don't exactly live forever. |
| Date | 21:34:20, May 05, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Lowering the Retirement Age ti 65 (Again) |
| Message | Other parties, why are you voting no? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 69 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 164 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 63 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: "Society comprises two classes: those who have more food than appetite, and those who have more appetite than food." - Nicolas Chamfort |