We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Pride Bill
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2169
Description[?]:
The current national symbols do little to help our national pride. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The National Animal.
Old value:: Deer
Current: Lupa
Proposed: Hawk
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The national motto.
Old value:: Sub Umbra Floreo
Current:
Patriae Unitas et Civium Libertas (Selucian) "Unity of the Country and Freedom of Citizens" |
Proposed: Carpe Diem
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The official national sport.
Old value:: Hunting
Current: Calcio
Proposed: Rugby
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:45:18, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Socialist Ecology Party | To | Debating the National Pride Bill |
Message | I agree, hunting our National Animal really is not very intelligent. |
Date | 22:25:28, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Free Expressives | To | Debating the National Pride Bill |
Message | I agree with changing the national sport to rugby, but I don't think there should be a national motto, we can't have everyone saying the same thing. |
Date | 07:51:51, January 10, 2006 CET | From | National Farmers' Party | To | Debating the National Pride Bill |
Message | 'I agree, hunting our National Animal really is not very intelligent.' How is it not 'intelligent'? I laugh at your self righteousness and hypocrisy of your party. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 483 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 267 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Since a politician never believes what he says, he is quite surprised to be taken at his word." Charles De Gaulle (1890 - 1970) |