We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1
Details
Submitted by[?]: Imperial Party of Selucian
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2169
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Selucian Liberty Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Selucian Nationalist Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Green Moderate Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Green Moderate Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Selucian Liberty Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Selucian Sovereignty Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Selucian Nationalist Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Selucian Liberty Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Imperial Party of Selucian
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Selucian Sovereignty Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Imperial Party of Selucian
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Green Moderate Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Selucian Sovereignty Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:27:04, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Imperial Party of Selucian | To | Debating the IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1 |
Message | This cabinet proposal is a middle-left suggestion. We think each party finds herself in a position her own main focus is fixed on, at least we think so. Also we tried to keep in mind the number of seat each party got in the last election. |
Date | 19:27:53, January 09, 2006 CET | From | VBS Party | To | Debating the IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1 |
Message | I think that's against ssp's principles: didn't he say he wouldn't go in a governement with you after the immigrants-schism? |
Date | 19:35:43, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Selucian Sovereignty Party | To | Debating the IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1 |
Message | After seeing the inept job you did as Finance Minister, I'm supporting this cabinet so SLP can return to his rightful place. I want a finance minister who represents all Selucians, and not just the wealthiest five per cent. My preference would be to be left ouf of this cabinet altogether, with my spots going to the other parties already in the coalition. However, for the sake of the financial stability of this nation, I'm willing to support this cabinet (though IPS can feel free to amend this one and give my spots to other parties already in the coalition). |
Date | 20:12:59, January 09, 2006 CET | From | VBS Party | To | Debating the IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1 |
Message | Well, I thought over 50% of the seats (and therefor: people) supported the budget and the income tax, because it got passed. Maybe there is a bug in the game, if I were you, I would contact on of the moderators to check that |
Date | 20:21:07, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Selucian Sovereignty Party | To | Debating the IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1 |
Message | No, clearly, over 50% supported your budget and tax proposal. That doesn't mean that I personally thought they were any good. I expected far better from someone who holds himself out to be some economic, business friendly expert. Instead, you were in the pocket of a very small economic elite, while the rest of Selucia suffered. I cannot in good concsience support a Finance Minister who would act in such a reckless way. Ultimately, the rest of the Senators will pass judgement on your performance through the cabinet proposal process. |
Date | 17:25:47, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Imperial Party of Selucian | To | Debating the IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1 |
Message | We will bring this to vote. If this fails the other one will follow. |
Date | 01:48:17, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Selucian Sovereignty Party | To | Debating the IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1 |
Message | Given that the SNP has voted against this one, I'd suggest IPS reintroduce this cabinet, minus SNP, and redistribute SNP's seats amongst the other partners of the coalition. |
Date | 11:43:42, January 11, 2006 CET | From | VBS Party | To | Debating the IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1 |
Message | I'd suggest IPS introduce the second proposal, like he promised |
Date | 17:17:06, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Selucian Liberty Party | To | Debating the IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1 |
Message | What sense would it make to do that, VBS? Do you honestly believes he wants you in a cabinet? |
Date | 17:25:50, January 11, 2006 CET | From | VBS Party | To | Debating the IPS - Cabinet Proposal of October 2168 /#1 |
Message | According to me, I am in the cabinet right now... together with IPS! Maybe you should think before you post |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 367 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 208 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
Random quote: "I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it." - Niccolo Machiavelli |