We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Commonwealth Workers Army
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2169
Description[?]:
| The Anarch Anakrousite Shatter wishes to push this issue back to the vote: Suggestion: The Anarch Anakrousite Shatter suggests "Convocation". Convocation: a group of people formally assembled for a special purpose. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The official title of the legislative assembly.
Old value:: Senate
Current: Congress of the Republic
Proposed: Convocation
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:54:15, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | The AAS begs the indulgence of the other parties. While the AAS believed they had submitted a full proposal in the Convocation (iv) Bill, it appears that our 'proposal' somehow didn't 'stick'. Thus - in effect - we submitted a Resolution, and not an actual 'Bill'. The AAS is, understandably, both saddened and frustrated.... as this was the first time we managed to muster the relevent number of votes. So... on bended knee, and with a sense of incredible chagrin, the AAS leader, Arkham Konstantinos, comes once again, cap in hand, on bended knee, to beg the indulgence of his Likatonian allies. Please, allow us to place a stamp of authentication on the 'history' of Likatonia... we beg you to, once again, support this policy. |
| Date | 16:54:56, January 09, 2006 CET | From | JLP Liberation Militia | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | JLP enthusiastically supports, again. |
| Date | 16:57:59, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | The AAS offers their most sincere thanks to our allies in the JLP. |
| Date | 17:39:33, January 09, 2006 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | RLP supports, and this time is here to vote. |
| Date | 17:43:12, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | The AAS most HEARTILY thanks the RLP for their support, this time. We had earnestly hoped that the RLP would get the chance to support, on the last run. In a way, that makes our party somewhat happier that our last 'Bill' turned out to be a mere 'Resolution'. Thanks also to the Progressive Party and the CdH. It is appreciated. It is gratifiying to see party-politics being swept aside, when the will of the people has been heard. |
| Date | 17:46:29, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | And - looking at the numbers, with the fulfillment of the remainder of the 'term' of this vote, Likatonia will be able to proudly claim to have a "Convocation" or Party Representatives. Does anyone have preferences for what we should call our officials? It makes no change to the Bill, or the legislation... and many of us have used interchangable names even while we had a 'Senate'. It is just a question of 'flavour'. The AAS currently favours the (neutral) term 'Representatives', or the term 'Advocates', to fit in with our "First Advocate" title. (But, as stated... this is just flavour). |
| Date | 21:58:17, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | The AAS thanks the PSS for their confirmation of support. |
| Date | 22:15:47, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | The AAS also offers profoundest thanks to the RWLP, for their support. |
| Date | 02:44:41, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | So - the only question remaining is... will The Strength Party vote against this bill again... or will they accept that it is 'the will of the people', and make it unanimous? |
| Date | 05:29:19, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Likaton Fascist Front | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | Nice to see so many pretty colours.. er .. parties... all lined up in row. If it doesn't stick this time, I suggest we speak to the mods. We reinforce the AAS comments about overlooking party politics, this is a great effort to those who supported. |
| Date | 15:16:56, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Convocation (v) |
| Message | OOC Response to the PSS: I suspect it was probably something as simple as one of those little glitches (you know, the ones that make you post the same thing like three times. Maybe I refreshed my page at the wrong time, or something. But - if we get 'no joy' this time, I'll post this result on the Forum, and see if I can't get the change 'moderated' in. As I said above - I'ma ctually kind of glad it didn't 'count' last time, because it means we got this much more unanimous and representative vote this time. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 462 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 38 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
| Random quote: "Were it not for electricity, we would have to watch television in the dark." - Muammar Gaddafi- |