We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 3850
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3850
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Royalist Party (Carlist)
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Royalist Party (Carlist)
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Hosian Socialist Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Royalist Party (Carlist)
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Hosian Socialist Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Progress Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Royalist Party (Carlist)
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Hosian Socialist Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Progress Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Royalist Party (Carlist)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:44:58, May 23, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3850 |
| Message | We here at Choice find it rather amusing that the Progress party is added to this coalition yet we are not, despite us probably having more similarities with the other parties. We do not believe this cabinet could run the country efficiently and as such shall vote against it and propose a more sensible cabinet. |
| Date | 18:04:13, May 23, 2015 CET | From | Progress Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3850 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Choice is correct that we line up on bills the most out of any party, but in fact we do not line up policy wise. They are isolationist, whereas we are internationalist. The same in regards to government size and regulation. We are opposites and if that doesn't mean a weak and unstable government I don't know what will. I yield |
| Date | 19:13:29, May 23, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3850 |
| Message | But surely if our parties line up most often with our bills most often out of the rest of the parties, that would surely mean a stable government, by joining this coalition and not the one proposed by us, you would be a progressive party in league with conservative parties, instead of joining my coalition of more progressive parties. |
| Date | 20:13:40, May 23, 2015 CET | From | Progress Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3850 |
| Message | Like stated before, bills lining up doesn't really matter as we are de-regulators and non-interventionists. Whereas you are the opposite. Our ideology and position has changed which the bill comparison does not reflect. We made be called the 'Progress Party', but that does not necessarily imply 'Progressive'. |
| Date | 20:15:31, May 23, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3850 |
| Message | We see, Choice is disappointed to hear of this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 153 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 61 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 136 |
| Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum. |
| Random quote: "We have to face the fact that either all of us are going to die together or we are going to learn to live together, and if we are to live together we have to talk." - Eleanor Roosevelt |