Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:14:14
Server time: 18:45:45, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): JourneyKan | Mindus | VojmatDunDSU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hosian Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 3856

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:39:05, June 02, 2015 CET
FromProgress Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy
MessageWe will happily vote for this.

Date18:59:14, June 02, 2015 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy
MessageWe are very strongly against this.

Date19:06:34, June 02, 2015 CET
FromProgress Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy
MessageWhy is Choice against this bill?

Date20:30:54, June 02, 2015 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy
MessageWe are against the Head of State and Head of Government being two separate officials, because in the long run we intend to make the head of government the head of state also (in the form of an elected president).

We are against Tittles of nobility may be granted only by the head of state, because we believe the government should be able to hand out titles also, it shouldn't be up to one person to hand out all titles.

We are somewhat neutral upon nobility confers titles and minor political rights, but no direct control over people or land, and can be hereditary, but we would MUCH MUCH rather have it as "Nobility confers only titles and certain minor rights, but no political powers, and is not hereditary."

So overall, we stand against the entirety of this bill.

Date20:35:53, June 02, 2015 CET
FromProgress Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy
Message(OOC: You can physically make someone hos and hog as it's not an option is it?)


Date21:44:32, June 02, 2015 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy
MessageWhat does hos and hog mean?

Date21:46:47, June 02, 2015 CET
FromHosian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy
MessageHead of government and head of state

Date12:20:08, June 03, 2015 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy
MessageI, see thanks for clarifying.

But still Progress Party, we don't think the option to have the hos and hog two separate officials, we think they should be the same official.

Date16:18:18, June 03, 2015 CET
FromRadical Communist Labour Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy
MessageMr. Speaker,

We refuse to ratify this treaty on the grounds that it strengthens the nobility.

Date17:50:17, June 03, 2015 CET
FromRoyalist Party (Carlist)
ToDebating the Ratification of the Deltarian Constitutional monarchy
MessageThis bill confers too little authority upon the nobility.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 162

no
    

Total Seats: 188

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically

Random quote: "Dictators ride to and fro upon tigers which they dare not dismount. And the tigers are getting hungry." - Winston Churchill

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66