We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: NPH has vices
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free White Castle and The People Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2170
Description[?]:
| Let's let Luthorian's have fun, also legalizing these might encourage tourism from some of the more fundementalist nations. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to gamble.
Old value:: Gambling is illegal.
Current: Gambling is legal, but only in private homes and casinos with special licences.
Proposed: Gambling is illegal unless taking place in a licensed casino.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The right for a person to prostitute himself or herself.
Old value:: Prostitution is illegal.
Current: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.
Proposed: Prostitution regulation decisions are left up to local governments.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: Recreational drug use is forbidden.
Current: Recreational drug use is regulated by local governments.
Proposed: The use of cannabis is legal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:52:51, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | Yes. |
| Date | 05:31:08, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | Ditch 2, and you have our support. Of course, 'tis not like it matters now.. |
| Date | 09:17:03, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Free White Castle and The People Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | Would you accept a lesser movement towards the legalization of prostitution, like leaving it in local hands? |
| Date | 16:10:27, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | That's a tough one. You see, since my party was created (I'm the oldest party in Luthori, btw), one of our key points was taking down prostitution. If you legalise it, more people will become prostitutes, instead of workers that could help build a strong state. Then prostitution will suck up alot of our money, that could have been used on buying weapons and such for the army. But if you put in in legal hands, I'll support it to pass the other two. Of course, then I'll make a bill against it =). |
| Date | 17:07:51, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Free White Castle and The People Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | But prostitution could bring in tourism, allowing for more money to spend on weaponry. |
| Date | 17:38:35, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | The wrong kind of tourism. I don't want Luthori to become the Netherlands of Particracy. I want it to become the Soviet Union of Particracy (in the way that we are respected and feared everywhere). |
| Date | 18:20:15, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Free White Castle and The People Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | But you will vote for it now? Since it is up to local hands? |
| Date | 18:25:48, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | You lot make me sick! You talk about civil liberties and utopia: then the first things you legalise are murder, men fucking each other, men fucking drug addicted victims of abuse and immigrants, gambling and drugs. Hell awaits all the so called "progressive" politicians! |
| Date | 18:43:24, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Free White Castle and The People Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | I hope there is cold beer in hell then. |
| Date | 23:49:40, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | DUP, letting people do what they want is better than killing everyone because they think fruity thoughts. |
| Date | 08:09:53, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | Why don't we nationalise prostitution and use the revenue to buy arms. |
| Date | 08:28:26, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Free White Castle and The People Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | In Luthori, we spread our legs for arms. |
| Date | 08:40:05, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | =D |
| Date | 09:58:33, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | "letting people do what they want"? "letting people do what they want"? Murder of unborn defenceless children, the elderly and infirm, prostitution and gambling? |
| Date | 20:49:17, January 12, 2006 CET | From | Seosavists Republican party | To | Debating the NPH has vices |
| Message | In real life I agree with what you said except the gambling, but the way I've played my party they wouldn't. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 410 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 256 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 84 |
| Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game. |
| Random quote: "He who controls the past, commands the future. He who commands the future, conquers the past." - Kane; Command and Conquer: Red Alert |