We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Pact 3858
Details
Submitted by[?]: Justice and Reform Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3859
Description[?]:
| Coalition of 3858: Order, DNP, NLP Resolution 2: All parties involved in the coalition must have a united agreement on a bill or else it cannot pass debate phase. Clause, any currently debated bills and bills being voted upon are abstained from this resolution. Resolution 3: All parties not involved in the coalition are not bound by it. Resolution 4: All coalition members must vote Yes or No, depending on what the coalition agrees on. Clause if a member does not agree or agrees with a bill but the rest are disputed or against the members vote, all members must vote Abstain that vote. Resolution 5: This bill is automatically repealed if an election takes place. Clause, if the seats remain the same and the members are happy to continue the coalition, then the repealment can be voted against. Resolution 6: If a member is for whatever reason upset at the coalition, they can leave it at any time. And the bill is automatically repealed and a new one must be drafted to comply. Resolution 7: Members who control a specific seat can only propose new bills which correlate with the specified seat. E.g. SRU can only propose bills which directly affect Food and Agriculture, Environment and Tourism or Trade and Industry. Clause, any currently debated bills and bills being voted upon are abstained from this resolution. |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Liberal Party of Davostan
Article 2
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal Party of Davostan
Article 3
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Justice and Reform Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Liberal Party of Davostan
Article 5
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Justice and Reform Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Justice and Reform Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Imperial Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Imperial Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Imperial Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Imperial Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Liberal Party of Davostan
Article 12
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Imperial Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Justice and Reform Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:21:50, June 08, 2015 CET | From | Liberal Party of Davostan | To | Debating the National Pact 3858 |
| Message | We'll agree is the following terms are applied to the cabinet rules. Prologue: Seeing as though the Left are useless at creating a united coalition thing. We have proposed our own coalition which includes every party EXCEPT the DSF. Proposed: Resolution 1: Davostan National Party will control, Head of Government, Finance, Internal Affairs and Foreign Affairs cabinet seats. Satanic Republican Party will control, Defence, Justice and Infrastructure and Transport cabinet seats cabinet seats. Social Republican Union will control, Food and Agriculture, Environment and Tourism and Trade and Industry cabinet seats. Jediism Party of Davostan will control, Science and Technology, Health and Social Services and Education and Culture cabinet seats. Resolution 2: All parties involved in the coalition must have a united agreement on a bill or else it cannot pass debate phase. Clause, any currently debated bills and bills being voted upon are abstained from this resolution. Resolution 3: All parties not involved in the coalition are not bound by it. Resolution 4: All coalition members must vote Yes or No, depending on what the coalition agrees on. Clause if a member does not agree or agrees with a bill but the rest are disputed or against the members vote, all members must vote Abstain that vote. Resolution 5: This bill is automatically repealed if an election takes place. Clause, if the seats remain the same and the members are happy to continue the coalition, then the repealment can be voted against. Resolution 6: If a member is for whatever reason upset at the coalition, they can leave it at any time. And the bill is automatically repealed and a new one must be drafted to comply. Resolution 7: Members who control a specific seat can only propose new bills which correlate with the specified seat. E.g. SRU can only propose bills which directly affect Food and Agriculture, Environment and Tourism or Trade and Industry. Clause, any currently debated bills and bills being voted upon are abstained from this resolution. |
| Date | 22:27:20, June 08, 2015 CET | From | State-Socialist Party | To | Debating the National Pact 3858 |
| Message | What about the Radical Bloc? I would also remind the NLP that we have a similair share of the peoples vote. In fact, a larger share. |
| Date | 00:37:57, June 09, 2015 CET | From | Justice and Reform Party | To | Debating the National Pact 3858 |
| Message | Is this one fine? |
| Date | 01:45:49, June 09, 2015 CET | From | State-Socialist Party | To | Debating the National Pact 3858 |
| Message | No and I just explained why. Why should the smallest party contain half of the governments positions, and the two parties above it be entirely excluded? |
| Date | 01:49:04, June 09, 2015 CET | From | Liberal Party of Davostan | To | Debating the National Pact 3858 |
| Message | Because this cabinet isn't meant to be a left-wing coalition? |
| Date | 14:52:57, June 09, 2015 CET | From | Imperial Party | To | Debating the National Pact 3858 |
| Message | I still think Radical bloc should get atention they are in a very powerfull position |
| Date | 15:13:30, June 09, 2015 CET | From | Party of Radicals | To | Debating the National Pact 3858 |
| Message | We will, of course, oppose this coalition. It's notable that a "national pact" is the name given to a much more narrow spectrum than that. Nevertheless, we promise to be a vociferous opposition. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 295 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 130 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
| Random quote: "George W. Bush will protect your unborn fetus, then send your grown child to die in war." - Rick Claro |