We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Admin Reform of 2169

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Malivia Democratic Party

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2169

Description^[?]:

Yay

Proposals

Article 1

Proposal^[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).

Old value:: 5

Current: 20

Proposed: 20

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	05:18:20, January 10, 2006 CET
From	Malivia Democratic Party
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	End the gag on new legislation

Date	16:52:26, January 10, 2006 CET
From	Peoples Front of Malivia
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	Support.

Date	23:07:52, January 10, 2006 CET
From	Malivia Democratic Party
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	Why don't you guys support? 5 is so stupid. It needs to be raised.

Date	23:09:02, January 10, 2006 CET
From	Malivia Democratic Party
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	Needless to say protectorate proposed this and ul also voted yes to this about 9 game years or so. I voted no back then because I wasn't paying attention and thought it decreased our ability to propose stuff.

Date	05:55:14, January 11, 2006 CET
From	Protectorate Party
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	I wanted to couple it with a decrease in the limit on how many you can hold on to. Will still support a decrease to 5 on the upper limit and an increase to 20 on the yearly return rate.

Date	07:17:47, January 11, 2006 CET
From	Malivia Democratic Party
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	How about a compromise then? make 15 the yearly amount and 9 or 10 storage sound good?

Date	07:18:47, January 11, 2006 CET
From	Malivia Democratic Party
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	actually do 20 and make the limit 8 or so. Thats stupid to set it to 5. Your still restraining legislation by doing that.

Date	16:51:42, January 11, 2006 CET
From	Protectorate Party
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	how? Active parties are still permitted to submit upto 20 proposals a yr. It is an increase from the current the same as this bill.

Date	19:35:55, January 11, 2006 CET
From	Malivia Democratic Party
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	Oh please. Your just scared someone will make a huge bill and screw you over...

Date	04:26:25, January 12, 2006 CET
From	Protectorate Party
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	What are you talking about we are the primary party making huge bills, and have no issue with others doing the same. OOC: Though I am doing it more out of laziness then anything else. And large bills are still possible under any scheme.

Date	07:48:11, January 12, 2006 CET
From	Malivia Democratic Party
To	Debating the Admin Reform of 2169
Message	yeah your scared...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 327

Total Seats: 172

abstain

Libertarian Jingoist Party (0)

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

Random quote: "Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom." - Friedrich Hayek

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59