We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of June 3863
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Progressive Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3864
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President of the Commonwealth chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Metzian Party of Lodamun
Article 3
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Metzian Party of Lodamun
Article 4
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Metzian Party of Lodamun
Article 5
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Metzian Party of Lodamun
Article 6
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Court of Shades
Article 7
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the United Republics Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the United Republics Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Liberal Progressive Alliance
Article 10
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Metzian Party of Lodamun
Article 11
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the United Republics Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Metzian Party of Lodamun
Article 13
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Metzian Party of Lodamun
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:11:25, June 19, 2015 CET | From | People of Freedom (P.F) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3863 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker You have got to be joking!!!! We know of a very good psychologist in andalay. But please ask for permission before entry. Honourable opposition. Dorian Powers General Secretary of the P.F M.P |
| Date | 02:38:54, June 19, 2015 CET | From |  Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3863 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, It would be very surprising if the UDHFU decided to abandon the Nationalist coalition to join a coalition with these other parties. The UDHFU has agreed with the LNC and PF more than 65% of the time, and had agreed with the GNRG more than 70% of the time: http://classic.particracy.net/compareparties.php?nationid=19 -- Trevor Fertig, Chairman of the GNRG, Vice President of GDR Lodamun |
| Date | 02:41:54, June 19, 2015 CET | From | Liberal Progressive Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3863 |
| Message | M. Speaker, I think the UDHFU would appreciate being able to make their own decisions without the GNRG clinging on. David Butterman Leader Eastern-Central Alliance |
| Date | 02:59:13, June 19, 2015 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3863 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The GNRG does not control the UDHFU. We do not control any of our partners in the coalition. We did not force the UDHFU to vote in line with us, and we cannot. We asked our coalition partners to support us on the treaty issue, but they were not obligated to listen to us, and they knew that. In an interview, Tony Anthony Shark said that the GNRG is the party that gets "respect most in the field" from the UDHFU: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&p=86499#p86374 | We did not tell them to say this. We did not expect them to say this. We were surprised and happy. They are our allies, not our minions. The GNRG does not control their decisions. The GNRG and the UDHFU vote in line with each other most of the time because we respect each other, and we agree on many issues. I think that David Butterman has failed to properly analyse the relations among parties in the coalition. It is the lack of understanding, that the current opposition parties have of other parties, that make them disadvantaged in negotiating. -- Trevor Fertig, Chairman of the GNRG, Vice President of GDR Lodamun |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 248 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 351 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453 |
| Random quote: "Soldiers are not the enemies of the movement. They're potential allies. They're more than that. Soldiers are the only people in America who are paying a stiff price for this war. Everybody else profits. Soldiers are the ones losing their lives, losing friends, having their lives disrupted. The real victims of American imperialism are its soldiers." - Fred Gardner |