Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 02:07:09
Server time: 21:52:50, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): hexaus18 | JourneyJak | rezins | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nobility abolishment

Details

Submitted by[?]: Fluss/River SD Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 3865

Description[?]:

This is a constitutional amendment to ban nobility.
Since its an amendment, we´ve to debate about it and both parties need to agree.
The point and single article is to ban nobility.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:50:16, June 19, 2015 CET
FromFluss/River SD Party
ToDebating the Nobility abolishment
MessageWhy should nobility be recognised? Everybody is an equal indvidual. I hope that your party´s got a reason why we shouldnt ban it.

Date17:46:09, June 20, 2015 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Nobility abolishment
MessageWe feel that exemplary service to the State or the the People should be recognized, and nobility, inherent in the very name, includes the concept of noble behavior. We do not hold that titles should be inherited, as the children of someone who performs a worthy service are no more likely to uphold that tradition than any other citizen; but the granting of a title commensurate with the action performed is well within the purview of the State.

Date22:07:13, June 20, 2015 CET
FromFluss/River SD Party
ToDebating the Nobility abolishment
MessageWe disagree. Exemplary service to the state, people or anything heroic shouldn't be recognised. People can be heroes, Fancy or helpful to the state but this still doesn't make them different from other homo sapiens and everyone should be equal. While it's true that some people are better than other but this still doesn't mean that they should be entitled by the state.

Date22:08:01, June 20, 2015 CET
FromFluss/River SD Party
ToDebating the Nobility abolishment
MessageNobility is medieval...

Date19:26:45, June 21, 2015 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Nobility abolishment
MessageBy recognizing exemplary service, we encourage it n those who see the recognition it grants. Hereditary nobility is, agreed, of no value; the granting of Life Estate titles, however, shows the rest of the people a good example and the value of heroic behavior.

Date21:04:05, June 21, 2015 CET
FromFluss/River SD Party
ToDebating the Nobility abolishment
MessageNyet a good example can also come from a not noble human, hereditary nobility is not worth the talks because we both already disagree. And recognising exemplary achievements with noble titles does not help. The Govt already supports people with amazing abilities.
A real world example: in the UK nobility is recognised, but it does not help, but the opposite.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 133

no
 

Total Seats: 117

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

    Random quote: The U.N. is a place where governments opposed to free speech demand to be heard. - MAD Magazine

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 52