Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5473
Next month in: 03:25:55
Server time: 12:34:04, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Renewal of our Military

Details

Submitted by[?]: AM Radical Libertarian Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3866

Description[?]:

In this less than perfect world, a strong military with a wide variety of options is critical for maintaining our proper place in the world.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:48:16, June 21, 2015 CET
FromFluss/River SD Party
ToDebating the Renewal of our Military
MessageCOMPLETELY unacceptable, I disagree totally.
A1 is unacceptable because of the horrible way this weaponry is killing people and the environment.
A2 Intelligence agencies (just like the real world NSA) are stupid and useless and only attack our privacy, covert operations are horrible, we can use diplomacy and para-diplomats.
A3 is unresponsible because the army could disuse that, plus the people should have the say about landmines, regulated by the Govt.
A4 Sorry mate, but I keep the Iceland-Greenland approach. We dont need it and in case of a case we still have a reserve group.
A6 is also unacceptable, because people should have the freedom to create their own para-military that doesnt have to be a part of a political party and of course should be heavily regulated by the Govt, for security.

A5 You should know that I know exactly how fission technology works (In case of Hydrogen weapons-also fussion technology), Fission is literally a nuclear process in which a neutron hits a heavy atom (e.g. Uranium)(Heavy atoms are mostly instable because of their number of neutrons in the nucleus) and then that heavy atom breakes into 2 smaller atoms, 1 to multipe free neutrons, α or β−/β+ or gamma decay. This is very dangerous.
I support a Nuclear programme , but it should be solely dedicated to research and should be within international laws.

We disagree and will vote against this bill.

Date14:45:47, June 24, 2015 CET
FromFluss/River SD Party
ToDebating the Renewal of our Military
MessageA military doesn't put you first in the world. It's either Science or money.

Date19:26:49, June 24, 2015 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Renewal of our Military
MessageBut without a strong military, one cannot keep one's science or money.

Date20:36:27, June 24, 2015 CET
FromFluss/River SD Party
ToDebating the Renewal of our Military
MessageLook at Switzerland...

Date19:09:41, June 25, 2015 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Renewal of our Military
MessageYou are referring to the country that has universal military service for all males, and which requires them to keep their weapons at home in case of call up, right?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 139

no
 

Total Seats: 111

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted.

    Random quote: "Politics, when it is an art and a service, not an exploitation, is about acting for an ideal through realities." - Charles De Gaulle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 76