We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Nationalist Fraction
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3869
Description[?]:
| A certain amount of religions are allowed in Lodamun, others aren't. We should keep track of what religions our population are followers of. This way we could determine how many followers a religion has and foresee in their needs. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Racial and religious registration of nationals.
Old value:: The government does not require nationals to register their race or religion.
Current: The government does not require nationals to register their race or religion.
Proposed: All nationals are required to register their religion.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:27:42, June 30, 2015 CET | From | People of Freedom (P.F) | To | Debating the Religious Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We currently support this action. Justin Palentine-Vox Internal Affairs Minister |
| Date | 00:55:22, July 01, 2015 CET | From | Social Labor Coalition | To | Debating the Religious Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We oppose this bill, for its requirement to register Lodamese people's beliefs with the government is unnecessary and is the start toward the eventual decline of freedom of religion and secular governance. It is an abrogation of that which we stand for, and thus we disapprove of this bill. C. T. Edwards Chairwoman of the PLF |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 259 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 295 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Let's call the drug war what it is, ethnic cleansing of Americans." - Jello Biafra |