Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5480
Next month in: 02:20:06
Server time: 17:39:53, May 08, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dnobb | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Calvinist Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2057

Description[?]:

While homeschooling is legal in this country, those who wish to exercise that right must jump through many legal hurdles, take multiple tests excessive of public-school standards, keep daily logs, and report rigorous portfolios. It is hereby resolved that homeschoolers are completely free to educate their children by themselves providing only a 24-hour notice to the nearest school district.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:43:27, May 19, 2005 CET
FromCalvinist Conservative Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageBecause the game does not have a proper education setting for this, this bill will be role-play only, with no proposals. A good idea, actually, for my first bill, makes it so that if I mess up nothing serious happens. ;-)

Date09:54:06, May 19, 2005 CET
FromSocial Dynamist Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
Message"It is a well known fact that homeschoolers are in general more intelligent", ff.
Baseless generalisation.

What guarantee do we have that children will be educated well? While the SDP proposed regulation and endorses periodical examination (for major exams, on a par with state schools, for day-to-day tests, no requirement) to ensure that children are being taught competently, no law has been enacted to make daily logs mandatory, insofar as a child does well. If the quality of a child's teaching is under question, parents may choose to make logs to show they are teaching their children properly. Many do this to keep a record of what they have taught, just as school teachers do.

Date17:50:47, May 19, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageSDP, I'd becareful in saying that it is a baseless generalisation. My brother was homeschooled and he is a very bright person. Smarter than most of the people his age. He ran circles around his hs teachers for the 1 month he as at the high school before going back to homeschooling.

Don't knock the homeschoolers.

Date18:12:37, May 19, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageThat's what a baseless generalisation is, PP: you take what happened in one case and apply it everywhere.

Date18:56:10, May 19, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageOh brother. Here's another example. Homeschoolers have been winning spelling bees like there is no tomorrow. THey are brighter than most people. That is a known fact.

Date20:13:02, May 19, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageJust because some, if not many, may be brighter, which might well be a result of their home-schooled education, does not mean that they should be exempt from meeting the standards set to ensure that sufficient education is provided to all the Tukaralian children. Besides, if they are much smarter, then there should be no problem for them to at the very least achieve a passing score on the exams required for completion of your education at the public school level.

In addition, the wording of the DBHA's description is largely inappropriate for insertion into the Tukarali Code. The Moderates recommend changing the wording so that it only states specificially the policy proposed.

Date22:48:32, May 19, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageBeing a teacher, I know this "baseline statement" to be false.

The Freedom Party will not support this.

Date23:49:39, May 19, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageYou don't know it to be false. You just don't like the fact that parents are teaching their kids at home. My parents did it with my brother and he was smarter than all the kids in his own grade. Most homeschoolers are actually more intelligent than the people that attend public schools. At least all the ones that I've met at anyrate and I've met quite a few.

Date03:20:58, May 20, 2005 CET
FromInactive
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
Messageyes, it is true that many home schoolers are smarter than average. Same with people in private schools AND public schools.
What about Gifted children? Are theu dumber than homeschooled students? I think not. it all depends on the situation and person.

Date05:14:26, May 20, 2005 CET
FromCalvinist Conservative Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
Message"Baseless generalisation."

I said, "In general." Not "always".

In accord with the request of the TMP I have moved the final paragraph to debate from the bill.

"It is a well known fact that homeschoolers are in general more intelligent. It is also being proven that homeschoolers are better citizens, participate more in government, commit less crimes, and that homeschooling does not adversely affect social skills."

"Besides, if they are much smarter, then there should be no problem for them to at the very least achieve a passing score on the exams required for completion of your education at the public school level."

And there is no problem with that. However, when people are required to meet excessive standards, it amounts to discrimination.

"What about Gifted children? Are theu dumber than homeschooled students? I think not. it all depends on the situation and person."

Quite true; yet they possibly could have had even more brought out of them had they been homeschooled. Especially in early grades, a one on one teacher-student relationship is much more conducive to good education.

Date22:08:06, May 20, 2005 CET
FromInactive
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageSo I am dumber than homeschooled children? I take offense to that.
I know some are homeschooled because they got expelled (not allt hoguh)

Date23:05:20, May 20, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageNo one said that De Vito! Not even CCP said that.

Date23:39:07, May 20, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessagePP: No, you misconstrue what I said. The baseline was that ""It is a well known fact that homeschoolers are in general more intelligent" While I know some who have been taught well at home, I have also seen some families use home schooling to manipulate the system (i.e. get out of suspensions or expulsions but pulling their kids to 'home schooling' where they are really just getting the trouble off their record and then transfering into a district elsewhere.) By making a 24 hour notice with no recourse of PROOF they are being taught, this in essence gives a loophole to the mandatory education law that we have already in place.

Date23:52:06, May 20, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageNotice the words that you just quoted. He said "In General". He didn't say that they all were. Geez.

Date03:31:53, May 21, 2005 CET
FromCalvinist Conservative Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
Message"So I am dumber than homeschooled children? I take offense to that."

I said no such thing. I said "quite true" to the effect of saying that giften children are NOT always dumber than homeschooled students.

"By making a 24 hour notice with no recourse of PROOF they are being taught, this in essence gives a loophole to the mandatory education law that we have already in place."

Is the government so stupid that it can't figure it out when people do that? Don't school districts keep records?

"I know some are homeschooled because they got expelled (not allt hoguh)"

The vast majority (like >99%) are homeschooled because their parents want them to get a better education, or for religious reasons, or because they want to spend more time with their children, or dozens of other innocent reasons. Don't condemn a whole movement on the actions of a criminal few.

Date01:59:07, May 22, 2005 CET
FromCalvinist Conservative Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageAs there has been no comment in the last ~24 hours this has been moved to a vote.

Date02:01:38, May 22, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageThe vote will get reset when Feburary hits. Therefor, I shall not cast a vote at this time.

Date02:14:04, May 22, 2005 CET
FromCalvinist Conservative Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
Messagepiffl. Oh well, you learn something new every day.

Date02:15:31, May 22, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
Messagehehe! I still would've voted for this but in Febuary we have elections. All the voting going on gets reset during election month.

Date14:29:12, May 22, 2005 CET
FromInactive
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageWe can't risk letting the few bad homeshooled children fall through the cracks.

Date17:31:04, May 22, 2005 CET
From3wide.com Antiparticulates
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
Messagenor would the vote matter anyway as it has no proposals.

Date18:31:26, May 22, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
Messageyea there is that too 3wide

Date19:25:22, May 22, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
Messagebut it's the RP that counts.

Date19:35:31, May 22, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageI agree wholeheartedly :)

Date21:10:06, May 22, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessagePatriot Party Calls the Question.

Date23:17:25, May 23, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
Messageagreed.

Date02:47:40, May 24, 2005 CET
FromCalvinist Conservative Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageMoved back to vote

Date13:42:23, May 24, 2005 CET
From3wide.com Antiparticulates
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageYet again, this bill is useless because it proposes nothing.

Date21:57:20, May 24, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageDefeated

Date03:28:28, May 25, 2005 CET
FromCalvinist Conservative Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageWhat happened? Why did everyone suddenly turn against?

Date03:43:45, May 25, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageI was always against. ;)

Date03:58:14, May 25, 2005 CET
FromCalvinist Conservative Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageBut PF wasn't...I think...

Date04:08:37, May 25, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageI wasn't at first CCP. However, I kept reading the bill over and since homeschooling is already allowed, what's the point?

Date03:37:18, May 26, 2005 CET
FromCalvinist Conservative Party
ToDebating the Don't Bother Homeschoolers Act (DBHA)
MessageTo make their lives easier

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 17

no
      

Total Seats: 261

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy.

    Random quote: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character." - Martin Luther King Jr.

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 105