Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:24:09
Server time: 20:35:50, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Act for the Support of Competitive Economics

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Izaäkian League

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 3873

Description[?]:

Mr Spreker,

Monopolies are never a good thing. Competition drives success, and drives down prices.The government should actively break up monopolies to ensure that economic competition is maintained in all sectors of the economy.

George Van Tassel
PUAU Chairman

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:39:18, July 07, 2015 CET
From Saridani Liberal Front
ToDebating the Act for the Support of Competitive Economics
MessageMr Spreker,

Actively breaking up monopolies that companies worked hard for years to achieve is simply theft, pseudo-socialist theft which ultimately lowers everyone's standard of living.

Moreover, it will highly discourage young people from creating new businesses as it limits their area of expansion significantly. Punishing businesses for thriving and expanding by breaking them apart, not only leads to lack of new businesses and a significant rise of the unemployment rate, but also to an ultimate economic collapse which is imminent if this bill passes.

A party made out of peasants and workers might not know this, but smaller businesses are really fragile and can fall into bankrupcy very, very quickly. Moreover, the main goal of the PUAU seems to be to lower everyone's income and standard of living by instituting socialist economic policies which were proven to have catastrophic consequences by the history.

PUAU is nothing more than a socialist farmers' party with no understanding of economics and the free market system.

We say NO to farmers' socialist theft policies!!

Lotte Van Althuis,
Sint Pietereiland Now! Leader

Date19:17:54, July 07, 2015 CET
From The Izaäkian League
ToDebating the Act for the Support of Competitive Economics
MessageMr Spreker,

Monopolies are not good for the economy. Competition drives success, drives up wages, drives down prices, and lifts the economy.

By the way, you are damn right we are a party of "peasants and workers". Peasants is derogatory word that only stuck up, ignorant, out of touch politicians like Lotte Van Althuis would use in this context. The SPN has truly solidified itself as a party so entirely out of touch with the populace. It is disgraceful because this was not always the case.

Our party cares about the common farmer and urban worker, your party cares about corporations. We are not socialist, we believe in a free, but regulated, market. We do not believe that the rich should give to the poor, we simply protect the poor from abuse, and try to extend to them the opportunity to earn wealth.

The true ideological difference between our party's is this. The SPN supports corporate capitalism, while the PUAU supports working class capitalism.

We say NO to a party of stuck up politicians who frequently have their pockets filled by the money of corporations, that seek to put into place a government that permits them to abuse laborers.

I think that Klaus Van Der Linden just turned in his grave after hearing the moronic comments that just spewed out of the entitled and stuck up brat's mouth. He must hate that she has led his once honorable party, straight into the ground.

Thomas Van Locklan
Kanselier

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 256

no
 

Total Seats: 244

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

    Random quote: "Capitalism and communism stand at opposite poles. Their essential difference is this: the communist, seeing the rich man and his fine home, says: 'No man should have so much.' The capitalist, seeing the same thing, says: 'All men should have as much.'" - Phelps Adams

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 48