We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Restrictions on nationality
Details
Submitted by[?]: Saridani National Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3876
Description[?]:
We believe that citizenship should only be given to those who truly deserve it. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship.
Old value:: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Current: Citizenship is gained by passing a qualifying exam.
Proposed: Citizenship is granted only to landowners.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Legality of multiple citizenship.
Old value:: Multiple citizenship is allowed, but must be registered.
Current: Multiple citizenship is allowed, but must be registered.
Proposed: Multiple citizenship is not allowed, and considered a criminal offense.
Article 3
Withdraw from the Nations Against Tyranny (NAT).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:58:56, July 12, 2015 CET | From | The IzaƤkian League | To | Debating the Restrictions on nationality |
Message | Mr Spreker, We will not support any of the recent proposed bills. The NAZIs are a pathetic and radical party that proposes outrageous bills to get attention to the cause, which is a cause rooted in backwardness and bigotry. Thomas Van Locklan Kanselier |
Date | 12:50:23, July 12, 2015 CET | From | Saridani National Party | To | Debating the Restrictions on nationality |
Message | Mr Sprekre May I address him by saying that by calling us pathetic he is calling over 5 million people in our country pathetic. If he thinks the people are pathetic, does he really deserve to be Kanselier? These bills are not outrageous, they propose to give more power and rights to the Saridani people. |
Date | 10:09:10, July 13, 2015 CET | From | Saridani Liberal Front | To | Debating the Restrictions on nationality |
Message | Mr Spreker, While 5 Milion of Saridanis may not view this as pathetic, the remaining 17 milion that voted either liberal or PUAU strictly oppose such changes. I don't really get the Nationalists' point about giving more freedoms and rights to Saridanis, is restricting women's rights the way to give "Power" and "Rights" to the people of Saridan? Honestly, I don't think so. I would like the Nationalists to clarify how they are interpreting their reforms. Lotte Van Althuis, SLF Leader |
Date | 11:02:19, July 13, 2015 CET | From | Saridani National Party | To | Debating the Restrictions on nationality |
Message | Mr Sprekre The remaining 17 million people obviously don't understand how drawing us away from our traditions, and letting millions of immigrants come into our country is a bad thing. Woman's rights is about giving more traditions back to Saridan. Also, the job of the Kanselier is to take into account the views of ALL the people of Saridan and not just the people who voted for him. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 116 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 384 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval. |
Random quote: "Wherever you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship." - Harry S. Truman |