Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 00:13:53
Server time: 03:46:06, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the International Recognition and Acceptance of the Martin Divergence

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Davostan

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3876

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the International Recognition and Acceptance of the Martin Divergence. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:20:55, July 13, 2015 CET
From Liberal Party of Davostan
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Recognition and Acceptance of the Martin Divergence
MessageI'd like to know everyones opinion on this.
I'm personally skeptical on this idea, but I am interested.

Date00:32:59, July 13, 2015 CET
From姬恩黨 (Jien Faction) 🌄
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Recognition and Acceptance of the Martin Divergence
MessageI would like to thank President McDee for allowing me the opportunity to address this house. You have my thanks and gratitude.

I am willing to address any questions and welcome all skeptics to relay their concerns so that we may collectively discover the answers.

Song Lin,
Minister of Education

Date01:51:07, July 13, 2015 CET
From State-Socialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Recognition and Acceptance of the Martin Divergence
MessageSeems like it is just establishing something as a historical fact. As long as it does not limit our ability to pass legislation, than I would say it does not infringe on our national sovereignty.

Date03:35:04, July 13, 2015 CET
From姬恩黨 (Jien Faction) 🌄
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Recognition and Acceptance of the Martin Divergence
MessageSir,

This treaty would not in any way infringe upon national sovereignty. As you said, it merely establishes historical fact.

I thank you for your comment and point of clarification.

Song Lin
Minister of Education

Date18:55:08, July 13, 2015 CET
From Justice and Reform Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Recognition and Acceptance of the Martin Divergence
MessageWe will vote yes.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 425

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

      Random quote: "I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality.... I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word." - Martin Luther King, Jr.

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 56