We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Medical Malpractice Oversight Committee Act of 3876
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alliance Res Publica
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3877
Description[?]:
| While allowing for ample financial penalties, this bill directs the Minister of Health and Social Services to establish the Medical Malpractice Oversight Committee(MMOC), which shall be chiefly responsible for reviewing and deciding on exclusively civil matters concerning issues where malpractice has been alleged. The Minister shall be responsible for communicating with the Counsel if additional staff and funding is required to ensure fair and timely review is allowed for each case presented. The MMOC shall not make criminal judges. Those shall be reserved to the systems of our nation's courts. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Malpractice suits.
Old value:: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Current: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Proposed: Only a medical regulatory body can prosecute a doctor for malpractice.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:13:26, July 15, 2015 CET | From | Republican People's Party | To | Debating the The Medical Malpractice Oversight Committee Act of 3876 |
| Message | Yes. |
| Date | 08:14:06, July 15, 2015 CET | From | Conquest Party of Mordusia | To | Debating the The Medical Malpractice Oversight Committee Act of 3876 |
| Message | We agree with this bill and would vote yes. This will save on health care costs due to the elimination of frivolous malpractice suits. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 130 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
| Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician |