We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: For a more obese government - on Security issues
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alianse Progresivitāte
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2170
Description[?]:
| Three milkshakes for breakfast, five for lunch, and 20 pounds of butter for dinner. It's the diet of champions... oh wait, now I remember, this is about making government bigger, not its citizens... sorry. ;-) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Current: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Proposed: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: Local governments may set curfews, but national government does not.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: No-one may use streets or public property beyond the curfew time.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns all defence industries.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: Citizens are not issued with identity cards.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:42:51, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the For a more obese government - on Security issues |
| Message | I dunno, I am going to wait and see how this one turns out. I am strongly against state owned industry, however, I believe that the rest of this bill is positive, and we could repeal that legislation at a later time. |
| Date | 23:52:44, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Socio-Democratic Union | To | Debating the For a more obese government - on Security issues |
| Message | For 1 and 4, Against 2 and also against 3. |
| Date | 11:17:19, January 12, 2006 CET | From | El Dorado | To | Debating the For a more obese government - on Security issues |
| Message | Too many proposal..you should split some up... I'm for 3 and partially for 4 |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 181 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 453 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 116 |
| Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
| Random quote: "I think one should not go fast, because if you make mistakes you don't realize what you've done." - Manuela Carmena |