We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Finding Space for Spending Cuts
Details
Submitted by[?]: One Cildania Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2171
Description[?]:
| While space exploration is interesting and perhaps useful in the future, with the current government coalition working to cut spending and tax cuts, we propose that the government withdraw from it's space agency and leave it to the private sector to develop until it becomes necessary for us to reinvest in this area. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards space exploration.
Old value:: The government shall operate a space agency that contracts with and oversees private space-exploration companies.
Current: Space exploration and use shall be totally unregulated.
Proposed: Space exploration and use shall be totally unregulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:26:59, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Satanic Individualists Network (SIN) | To | Debating the Finding Space for Spending Cuts |
| Message | We agree. |
| Date | 09:11:14, January 12, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party of Cildania | To | Debating the Finding Space for Spending Cuts |
| Message | While we are pained to something like space exploration that our party strongly supports, we agree to support it in an attempt to decrease national spending |
| Date | 05:26:08, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Libertarian Cildanians | To | Debating the Finding Space for Spending Cuts |
| Message | Doesn't the government have a role to play in ensuring that unworkable plans for space flight aren't put into effect so as to protect passengers? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 180 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 89 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 156 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Presidency, n. The greased pig in the field game of American politics." - Ambrose Bierce |