Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 00:52:39
Server time: 23:07:20, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | Klexi | luthorian3059 | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Welfare Provision Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: ÖkoLinks

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 3877

Description[?]:

The fact that the state guarantees no welfare provision at all is appalling and leaves millions of people trapped in poverty.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:18:53, July 16, 2015 CET
FromÖkoLinks
ToDebating the Welfare Provision Act
MessageIt is interesting that even when we water our proposals down the nationalists still wont vote in favour. If this bill does not pass the country will continue to lack a much-needed welfare safety net and millions of people across these lands will be signed-up to years of poverty and suffering. The nationalists completely lack any sense of compassion or respect for humanity. Not only do they want to maintain poverty abroad through tied but they also want to maintain poverty at home too. My party simply hopes that the centrists will acknowledge the need for these basic provisions.

Currently, we are in a group of only three countries in the world which do not provide child welfare to citizens, and a group of 6 with no pension provision. This is unacceptable and disturbing.

- Klemens Müller, ÖkoLinks Leader

Date16:47:21, July 16, 2015 CET
FromNationalistische Partij Narikaton
ToDebating the Welfare Provision Act
MessageThe NPN would have supported this bill but for article 3. Compulsory public pensions are unnecessary, particularly when combined with private pension options. The market can and has adequately handled the retirement needs of Republican citizens for years. A public option represents a state-sponsored (and thus advantaged) competitor in an otherwise fair marketplace.

Though I suspect Mr. Müller may have a heart attack when I say it (good think Narik hospitals are the best in Artania, free market run!), the NPN supports articles 1 and 2.

- Ewout Van Rompay, NPN Leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 57

no
 

Total Seats: 26

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position.

    Random quote: "I start with the premise that the function of leadership is to produce more leaders, not more followers." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58