We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Liberties Bill of 3877
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Democratic Action Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3878
Description[?]:
| We, the UNLDP believe that further steps should be taken to improve civil liberties in this nation. We also propose that if anyone is found with a restricted weapon in another place rather than the designated place, the person will not receive a prison term, but he will receive lessons on why not to bring restricted weapons in another place rather than the designated place. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding bestiality (performing sexual acts with animals).
Old value:: Bestiality is legal and unregulated.
Current: Bestiality is only legal for the pornographic businesses.
Proposed: Bestiality is illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Citizens may own any type of weapons, but certain types are restricted to designated places.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:44:49, July 16, 2015 CET | From |  Liberal Party of Davostan | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Bill of 3877 |
| Message | Article 1. We agree with you here. Article 2. I'm not sure about this one. It's a citizens right to present criticism to another person, group or party no matter how harmful or tame it is. Article 3. We agree with you here. |
| Date | 15:05:51, July 16, 2015 CET | From | Justice and Reform Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Bill of 3877 |
| Message | We will support all articles but article 3. |
| Date | 15:06:13, July 16, 2015 CET | From | Social Centrist Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Bill of 3877 |
| Message | We agree on Article 1 Article 2 Is anti- freespech so we dissagree and should we trust people to carry any kind of weopon? we will vote for becouse this is better then our current legelation but we would want to see more regulated |
| Date | 18:01:37, July 16, 2015 CET | From | State-Socialist Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Bill of 3877 |
| Message | We support this now. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 425 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "When there's a single thief, it's robbery. When there are a thousand thieves, it's taxation. " -Vanya Cohen |