Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5574
Next month in: 01:34:20
Server time: 14:25:39, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Business and Entrepreneurial protection Act - 3878

Details

Submitted by[?]: Ukulondolozwa / Preservation

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3879

Description[?]:

x

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:49:50, July 19, 2015 CET
FromSezenhlalo Caucus
ToDebating the Business and Entrepreneurial protection Act - 3878
MessageThe party members in the Sezenhlalo Caucus cannot support this.

--

Kefilwe Bapai,
Sezenhlalo Caucus Leader,
National Party Leader

Date17:55:10, July 19, 2015 CET
FromUkulondolozwa / Preservation
ToDebating the Business and Entrepreneurial protection Act - 3878
MessageWe already know that the Sezenhlalo Caucus is ought to destroy our countries economy and entrepreneurship.

Bongani Zuma
Ukulondolozwa Leader

Date17:59:02, July 19, 2015 CET
FromSezenhlalo Caucus
ToDebating the Business and Entrepreneurial protection Act - 3878
MessageWe are all in one party. Let us not bash each other.

--

Kefilwe Bapai,
Sezenhlalo Caucus Leader,
National Party Leader

Date18:07:16, July 19, 2015 CET
FromUkulondolozwa / Preservation
ToDebating the Business and Entrepreneurial protection Act - 3878
MessageOur Party should be more concerned about our economy. Without the right conditions and values we will only go backwards. We hope that other members within the party will be more open for supportive for our businesses and entrepreneurs.

Bongani Zuma
Ukulondolozwa Leader

Date18:12:42, July 19, 2015 CET
FromSezenhlalo Caucus
ToDebating the Business and Entrepreneurial protection Act - 3878
MessageThe party is capable of managing the economy. The economy is doing well without foreigners and bourgeois scum telling us what to do.

--

Kefilwe Bapai,
Sezenhlalo Caucus Leader,
National Party Leader

Date18:22:37, July 19, 2015 CET
FromSocial-Liberal Caucus
ToDebating the Business and Entrepreneurial protection Act - 3878
MessageDear M. Zuma,

The Social-Liberal faction is not as much closed at your ideals than the Caucus. However, our group recognizes a right to strike to the workers, a thing you seem to be far less warm than us to. If the article one of this bill could be removed, we could consider supporting it.

It seems to us that you are right when you say that the economy greatly suffer from unending srikes. And this very much happens right now when the unions feel entitled to join every other union strike, thus greatly weakening our economy. We do not either specially wish to subsidise unions, since as we see it, they can stand for their own.

So our ouly problem, as said above, is with the article one, which effectively makes striking illegals, since employers could fire syndicalists. This would be an inacceptable regress in the history of the worker's rights of Ibutho.

Ziphozonke KaNathi,
Social-Liberal candidate to the ministry of Trade and Industry

Date18:26:23, July 19, 2015 CET
FromSezenhlalo Caucus
ToDebating the Business and Entrepreneurial protection Act - 3878
MessageIf the workers directly benefit or lose from a company's performance, instead of being included only through some detached wage system, they would understand that strikes are unproductive. This is why we must encourage the formation of Democratic Workers' Councils, where workers collectively own a business. When they work harder, they profit. When they do not work hard enough, they lose.

--

Kefilwe Bapai,
Sezenhlalo Caucus Leader,
National Party Leader

Date18:27:27, July 19, 2015 CET
FromUkulondolozwa / Preservation
ToDebating the Business and Entrepreneurial protection Act - 3878
MessageMr. Ziphozonke KaNathi

It is clear that companies can not fire employees for fun just because they've been on strike. Yet we want to prevent useless strikes such as individual actions or useless strikes for just 5 minute longer coffee brakes. It can not that businesses should be hostages of the employees.

Bongani Zuma
Ukulondolozwa Leader

Date22:14:06, July 19, 2015 CET
FromSocial-Liberal Caucus
ToDebating the Business and Entrepreneurial protection Act - 3878
MessageDear M. Zuma,

As much as we understand what you are saying, we still see article 1 as impossible to support for us. Your intent may be to reduce "useless strikes", but the actual provision you are supporting says that employers can fire people without a reasonable reasons, which means they would be able to fire employees just because they went to strike. Since this bill is now put to vote, we have to oppose it, but we are looking forward to find some understanding with you in the future.

Ziphozonke KaNathi,
Social-Liberal candidate to the ministry of Trade and Industry of the National Party

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 299

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation.

Random quote: "And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush Administration again." - Bill O'Reilly

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70