We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: PPT Platform: Ecology
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Labour Party of Telamon
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2171
Description[?]:
| --- |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government requires tree plantation at replacement level for all logging or clearance operations.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Current: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Proposed: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:45:55, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the PPT Platform: Ecology |
| Message | 1. No...i am not going to recycle if i don't want to. I have better things to do, and i know what i throw away doesn't harm the enviroment even 1/1000 as much as an industry does. 2. Make a case.... 3. Probably yes...but make a case regardless. |
| Date | 13:59:26, January 13, 2006 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the PPT Platform: Ecology |
| Message | 1. no 2. maybe, though i think the current is sufficient 3. probably yes but convince me |
| Date | 16:25:44, January 13, 2006 CET | From | United Labour Party of Telamon | To | Debating the PPT Platform: Ecology |
| Message | Often, replacement levels are not enough for wildlife to return to the area. And the logging companies plant only one kind of tree to get the most profits, so not that many species of animals can live there. Water quality depends on many things. |
| Date | 18:06:09, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the PPT Platform: Ecology |
| Message | I would agree with both, as industry can treat its own water (and often does not need drinking quality) and replacement levels should be higher because of die off |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 252 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 87 | |||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 16 |
| Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated. |
| Random quote: "Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person." - Mother Teresa |