Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5481
Next month in: 01:27:53
Server time: 22:32:06, May 09, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Autokrator30 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Head of State Bill, 2170

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of Evil

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2172

Description[?]:

Proposing to separate the offices of Head of State and Head of Government, on the grounds that the combination puts too much power (as well as responsibility) in the hands of one person.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:28:49, January 13, 2006 CET
FromUnion of Work-Shy Elements
ToDebating the Head of State Bill, 2170
MessageTwo heads better than one? Maybe.

What would your party propose calling this new head of government post.

Date01:28:17, January 13, 2006 CET
FromAlderdath Rabrati Konciralati Erradikati
ToDebating the Head of State Bill, 2170
MessageLinchpin, of course. Barring that, we could always resurrect Praetor.

Date01:35:17, January 13, 2006 CET
FromAlderdath Rabrati Konciralati Erradikati
ToDebating the Head of State Bill, 2170
MessageOops, didn't read who authored this bill (so we thought the IP was asking a hypothetical of other parties). But our party supports linchpin, so there! Nyah!

Date02:24:55, January 13, 2006 CET
FromUnio enim si quis Motus Populi
ToDebating the Head of State Bill, 2170
MessageWon't pass, thankfully =)

I like the "presidential system" Prevents us from bickering over who should be Head of Government.

Date03:14:47, January 13, 2006 CET
FromAlderdath Fedrali
ToDebating the Head of State Bill, 2170
MessageI concur, Oligarchies dont' really work all that well, one leader is more than enough.

Date04:20:23, January 14, 2006 CET
FromParty of Evil
ToDebating the Head of State Bill, 2170
MessageWe propose 'Proconsul', but 'Praetor' or 'Linchpin' are acceptable. And this has nothing to do with oligarchies; we merely want to separate the two. The Consul holds enough power as Head of government without also being Head of State.

Date14:59:22, January 14, 2006 CET
FromKundrati Socialist Party
ToDebating the Head of State Bill, 2170
MessageWe agree with the LSU.

Date22:58:30, January 15, 2006 CET
FromAlderdath Fedrali
ToDebating the Head of State Bill, 2170
MessageWon't this just be put back on the floor when the election cycle comes around.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 93

no
     

Total Seats: 186

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots.

Random quote: "The one bonus of not lifting the ban on gays in the military is that the next time the government mandates a draft we can all declare homosexuality instead of running off to Canada." - Lorne Bloch

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 74