We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Carriage of Firearms by the Police
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Kirlawa
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3894
Description[?]:
Voting will begin in September. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Current: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Proposed: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:47:18, August 18, 2015 CET | From | Alliance for Nature and Workers | To | Debating the Carriage of Firearms by the Police |
Message | No, we wouldn't go this far. It's strange for a conservative party to have this kind of policies, though. |
Date | 01:16:00, August 19, 2015 CET | From | Conservative Party of Kirlawa | To | Debating the Carriage of Firearms by the Police |
Message | We are more on the libertarian side. |
Date | 14:38:10, August 19, 2015 CET | From | Liberal-Democratic Freedom Party | To | Debating the Carriage of Firearms by the Police |
Message | OOC: Don't think I've ever heard of libertarians wanting to take guns from any one. Not even the police. I should know because I am a libertarian. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 287 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 352 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 78 |
Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
Random quote: "Economic advance is not the same thing as human progress." - John Clapham |