We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Foreign Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anti-Ownership Federation Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2171
Description[?]:
... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change International trade (this is a default in the absense of a specific free trade agreement or specific trade embargo)
Old value:: The nation imposes reciprocal tariffs on imports, with no tariffs imposed on states which impose no tariffs on our exports.
Current: The nation allows for imports, but imposes tariffs and quotas in certain areas.
Proposed: The nation allows for imports, but imposes protectionist tariffs and quotas on all imports.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:46:50, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Foreign Protection Act |
Message | Why should we tariff those that don't tariff us?! |
Date | 02:36:55, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Foreign Protection Act |
Message | because weas TElamonians are better than the others |
Date | 17:08:10, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Foreign Protection Act |
Message | Ah! That makes so much sense! I see the light......and a bunch of kids playing with that same light. Oh well. |
Date | 18:08:10, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Foreign Protection Act |
Message | What about industries that depend on imports? This is a sure way to stifle our economy. |
Date | 21:27:49, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United | To | Debating the Foreign Protection Act |
Message | These kids have no idea what the hell they are doing. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 164 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 175 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 16 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "In public policy, it matters less who has the best arguments and more who gets heard, and by whom." - Ralph Reed |