We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fair government act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fria Kommunistiska Alliansen
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3897
Description[?]:
| we believe in a fair government, that mean, a government that hjide nothing from its citizen. we also believe in fair business, like the government, business should have the right to hide anything to the citizen. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Freedom of information law.
Old value:: Classified files are released after a set period of time provided doing so is not deemed to endanger national security.
Current: Classified files are released after a set period of time provided doing so is not deemed to endanger national security.
Proposed: Classified files are released after a set period of time.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Privacy protection for those in the public eye.
Old value:: The media may publish personal stories and photos relating to public figures, but only if deemed in the interest of the public.
Current: The media may publish personal stories and photos relating to public figures, but only if deemed in the interest of the public.
Proposed: There are no restrictions on the media for pursuing personal stories and photos relating to the lives of public figures.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on the source code of software.
Old value:: The government does not require that all source be opened but heavilly regulates closed source software.
Current: The government allows both open and closed source software.
Proposed: The government requires that all source be opened.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:34:46, August 25, 2015 CET | From | Folkepartiet (People's Party) | To | Debating the Fair government act |
| Message | So let me get this straight, Mr. Speaker. The Communists believe that it should be admissible for journalists to pursue a story about, say, a fight with my wife? Since when does our oath of office contain forfeiture of the right to privacy? Ingbert Mathiassen (FP-Hent) Parliamentary Group Leader |
| Date | 15:06:07, August 25, 2015 CET | From | Fria Kommunistiska Alliansen | To | Debating the Fair government act |
| Message | Mr Speaker Yes, we believe the people have the right to know it. the government has no reason to oppress the media Nathalie Danielsson, Depute for the FKA |
| Date | 15:20:01, August 25, 2015 CET | From | Folkepartiet (People's Party) | To | Debating the Fair government act |
| Message | What about my right to a private life, Mr. Speaker? Ingbert Mathiassen |
| Date | 15:30:09, August 25, 2015 CET | From | Fria Kommunistiska Alliansen | To | Debating the Fair government act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I believe the people won't be interested by your public life, but by your relations with the big business.. |
| Date | 15:37:34, August 25, 2015 CET | From | Folkepartiet (People's Party) | To | Debating the Fair government act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, That is unworthy of a representative of the people. The lady should withdraw that insinuation at once or produce proof. |
| Date | 15:47:32, August 25, 2015 CET | From | Fria Kommunistiska Alliansen | To | Debating the Fair government act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker Bad relations with big business are still relations, I did not say that the FP is a party of business, simply that they, like all parties, have a relations with business, may it be bad or good and our own relations is very bad,. Nathalie Danielsson, Depute for the FKA |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 29 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 110 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved." - Confucius |