Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5479
Next month in: 03:48:57
Server time: 20:11:02, May 06, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | HopesFor | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anti-Corruption Bill 2054

Details

Submitted by[?]: Patriarchal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2057

Description[?]:

Considering recent bribery and corruption scandals in other countries, a system must be implemented to deal with this before Davostan suffers such a scandal. If this were to happen, then any bill proposed would be reactionary and, most likely, disproportionate. Therefore, procedures must be implemented now to deal with corrupt politicians.

I propose that any member of the HoR, or any civil servant, who is alleged to have been involved in corrupt activity, should be subject to an inquiry by a committee of senior politically-independent civil servants. A petition signed by 10% of the legislature (currently 50 MHoRs) would be required to force such an inquiry.

However, if the subject of the inquiry is to be the Head of Government, a 15% petition is required, and for the Head of State, 25%.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:05:30, May 20, 2005 CET
From Patriarchal Party
ToDebating the Anti-Corruption Bill 2054
MessageTo clarify: HoR = House of representatives; MHoR = Member of the House of Representatives.

Date21:51:07, May 20, 2005 CET
From Unity Party
ToDebating the Anti-Corruption Bill 2054
MessageThey committee should be free of political bias.

Date13:50:20, May 21, 2005 CET
From Coallition of Idiots
ToDebating the Anti-Corruption Bill 2054
MessageYup

Date00:42:57, May 22, 2005 CET
From Patriarchal Party
ToDebating the Anti-Corruption Bill 2054
MessageSo would changing the wording to "a committee of senior politically-independent civil servants" be OK?

Date17:53:25, May 22, 2005 CET
From Unity Party
ToDebating the Anti-Corruption Bill 2054
MessageYes.

Date18:49:20, May 22, 2005 CET
From Patriarchal Party
ToDebating the Anti-Corruption Bill 2054
MessageDone.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 293

no
 

Total Seats: 99

abstain
 

Total Seats: 43


Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current.

Random quote: "We need a new environmental consciousness on a global basis. To do this, we need to educate people." - Mikhail Gorbachev

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52