We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: OMP Act of 2170 - Military Policy Resolution II
Details
Submitted by[?]: Edelweiss Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2171
Description[?]:
| For Likatonia! Honorable Colleagues, We cannot allow private defence industries operating between our borders, for security and strategic reasons our party believes that all defence industries should be under complete control of the government. Regards |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: The state owns all defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns all defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:05:58, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Liberal Party | To | Debating the OMP Act of 2170 - Military Policy Resolution II |
| Message | We feel comfortable with this, and if managed properly, could land extra investment for the Armed Forces. |
| Date | 00:11:08, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Likaton Fascist Front | To | Debating the OMP Act of 2170 - Military Policy Resolution II |
| Message | We have reached a stage of weapons development that involves nuclear weapons, the PSS has already stated that we prefer this to be kept in house, rather than find out some private company has sub contracted a critical process to a lowest bidder in another country. Support for practical, rather than ideological reasons. |
| Date | 04:39:11, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the OMP Act of 2170 - Military Policy Resolution II |
| Message | The AAS is almost amazed to find an OMP policy that we CAN approve. |
| Date | 04:40:04, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the OMP Act of 2170 - Military Policy Resolution II |
| Message | As a matter of interest, the AAS wonders why the Socialist Liberals would oppose this... which seems like a very much 'socialist' policy... |
| Date | 05:23:09, January 14, 2006 CET | From | JLP Liberation Militia | To | Debating the OMP Act of 2170 - Military Policy Resolution II |
| Message | Commisar John Lennon agrees. We must drive the private companies from our Motherland. |
| Date | 10:05:26, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the OMP Act of 2170 - Military Policy Resolution II |
| Message | Why do you ant to inhibit the national GDP? |
| Date | 11:44:18, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Liberal Party | To | Debating the OMP Act of 2170 - Military Policy Resolution II |
| Message | It will have little effect, in as much as it will pay for itself surely, via the exportation of state produced arms. |
| Date | 21:16:46, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the OMP Act of 2170 - Military Policy Resolution II |
| Message | The AAS wonders what makes the RWLP believe this legislation would adversely affect GDP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 307 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 133 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 60 |
| Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation. |
| Random quote: "I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church." - Thomas Paine |