Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 00:55:42
Server time: 03:04:17, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Future Navy Of Jakania

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 3918

Description[?]:

This is what the navy could look like after we sort out the military.



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_R._Ford-class_aircraft_carrier
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arleigh_Burke_class_destroyer
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphibious_assault_ship

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:47:19, September 16, 2015 CET
FromAl-Ḥizb Al-Waṭanī Ad-Dīmūqrāṭi
ToDebating the Future Navy Of Jakania
MessageOOC: absolutely out of the question. There is no basis for Jakania to have a modern aircraft carrier when it can't even maintain basic internal cohesion.

Date22:33:43, September 16, 2015 CET
FromLiberal Party
ToDebating the Future Navy Of Jakania
MessageThis is future navy design not at this moment.

Date22:06:18, October 04, 2015 CET
From Moderation
ToDebating the Future Navy Of Jakania
MessagePut to the vote for archiving.

- Aquinas

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no

      Total Seats: 0

      abstain
       

      Total Seats: 100


      Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

      Random quote: "The Revolution needs to progress. We as humans need to evolve into higher beings through better moral virtues. And we can achieve that if we clean ourselves from the immoral. Those who go against the Revolution, go against human progress and must be freed in the most humane way possible. That is why we introduced the guillotine." - Maximus Robertson, former Davostani revolutionary

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 49