We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Flag Desecration Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Co-Operative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3915
Description[?]:
| The Co-Operative party believes that if we are to be a truly free and liberal society then we must allow flag desecration as a means of expression and protest, despite our qualms at the action itself. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National policy regarding the desecration of the national flag.
Old value:: The national flag may not be desecrated or dishonoured.
Current: The national flag may not be desecrated or used for commercial purposes.
Proposed: There are no regulations regarding the desecration or use of the national flag.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:29:37, September 21, 2015 CET | From |  Liberal Party of Davostan | To | Debating the Flag Desecration Bill |
| Message | I guess we support. |
| Date | 02:14:03, September 22, 2015 CET | From | United Democratic Action Party | To | Debating the Flag Desecration Bill |
| Message | Support. |
| Date | 03:40:31, September 22, 2015 CET | From | Common Sense Conservative Party | To | Debating the Flag Desecration Bill |
| Message | This is a great insult and dishonor to the many men and women who have fought and died wearing the national flag. |
| Date | 17:49:19, September 22, 2015 CET | From | Justice and Reform Party | To | Debating the Flag Desecration Bill |
| Message | No/ |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 187 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 272 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 41 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "For among other evils caused by being disarmed, it renders you contemptible; which is one of those disgraceful things which a prince must guard against." - Niccolo Machiavelli |