We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Administrative Easing Act
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3915
Description[?]:
| The Progressives hopes to pass a non-binding initiative to combine bills and proposals into one act by its different policy areas before its introduction so as to ease the voting processes of parties. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:49:25, September 29, 2015 CET | From | United Nationalists | To | Debating the Administrative Easing Act |
| Message | Im afraid We don't quite understand what your getting at, if you could explain further we would surely vote. |
| Date | 12:42:01, September 30, 2015 CET | From | Alliance | To | Debating the Administrative Easing Act |
| Message | This act hopes to call for a combination of bills before they are submitted so for an example the Women and Homosexuals in the Army bills can be combined into one to ease voting procedures and facilitate debates. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 80 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 100 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." - Mahatma Gandhi |