Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 00:08:27
Server time: 03:51:32, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): itsjustgav | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Reciprocal Tariffs Act, 3917

Details

Submitted by[?]: Folkepartiet (People's Party)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3918

Description[?]:

A BILL to encourage a bilateral end to protectionism.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:58:41, October 05, 2015 CET
From Folkepartiet (People's Party)
ToDebating the Reciprocal Tariffs Act, 3917
MessageHerr President,

I rise to pre-empt Herr Schausberger.

Don't worry, Herr President, I am going to be my perfectly civil self. I rise to pre-empt not Herr Schausberger's policy of callously ending foreign aid, or the Foreign Minister himself, but his major argument to it. This bill shows Folkepartiet's alternative to promoting our trade interests - not over the backs of third-world countries, but through a very simple rule of thumb: we agree that no tariffs are better for both of us, and therefore if you don't impose tariffs on us, we won't impose tariffs on you.

The best thing about it is that it doesn't cost as much as a kroner to us, whereas Herr Schausberger would like very much to use the foreign aid budget to buy trade rights. I give you this bill: it's more cost-efficient and more importantly, it is morally sound as a way to promote free trade. I commend it to the House.

Finn Martinsen (FP - Dreton)
FP Deputy Leader and Economics Spokesman

Date12:04:07, October 05, 2015 CET
From Borgerlig-Demokratiske Union
ToDebating the Reciprocal Tariffs Act, 3917
MessageMr Speaker,

I am delighted to find myself effectively agreeing with the hon. lady on the beneficial effect of free trade. But I do not see this proposal as an alternative to the fair and economically sound aid-for-trade-scheme we remain committed to. I see it as a supplementary measure that will greatly assist the effective realization of the aforementioned policy once we get to abolish the legal restrictions that prevent us from acting.

Erwin Schausberger (FV)
Minister of Foreign Affairs

Date12:05:44, October 05, 2015 CET
From Folkepartiet (People's Party)
ToDebating the Reciprocal Tariffs Act, 3917
Message(OOC: Er, it's Finn Martinsen speaking, not Nelline)

Date17:13:58, October 05, 2015 CET
From Borgerlig-Demokratiske Union
ToDebating the Reciprocal Tariffs Act, 3917
MessageOOC: Oops.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 90

no
  

Total Seats: 41

abstain
 

Total Seats: 8


Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

Random quote: "God creates men, but they choose each other." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 50