We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Justice Act 2171
Details
Submitted by[?]: We Say So! Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2172
Description[?]:
| In order to guarantee the privacy of all peoples within the Republic of Hobrazia, whilst also guaranteeing that, in times of requirement, including but not limited to criminal hearings etc, all relevent information is available for scrutiny, the Government will allow the use of Habeas Data. This law may not be used without a decision of not less than 2 senior judges of the Hobrazian Judiciary. Should any information be found not directly pertaining to the case at hand then this information may not be released into the public domain, nor may it be used in a Court of Law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:07:36, January 14, 2006 CET | From |  United Blobs | To | Debating the Justice Act 2171 |
| Message | We retain our support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 216 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 184 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453 |
| Random quote: "It makes no difference, in principle, if this 'collective will' is divined by the edicts of a dictator or by majority vote, so long as the rights of the individual may still be sacrificed." - Robert Garmong |