We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Restriction of landmine use
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alorian Liberty Alliance (ALA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3920
Description[?]:
| We think that anti-personell mines can cause a lot of damage among civilians long after the conflict ended. The majority of landmine victims are civilians, not soldiers. Most of landmine casualties are peace-time deaths. Land mines can cause deaths long after the conflict ends. Every 22 minutes, someone somewhere around the world is killed or maimed by a landmine. We are here to take the first step in the right direction by restricting use of landmines to unpopulated areas. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed.
Current: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Proposed: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:36:34, October 10, 2015 CET | From |  Alorian Parti Bishopal (APB) | To | Debating the Restriction of landmine use |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The heart of this matter is a tricky one for it is hard to discount the practical use of these devices in warfare. I myself am not personally a military man however I am told that they are key in halting enemy advances and providing valuable time to reinforce fronts which are deemed as weak or unprepared. Whilst we agree that civilian casualties is appalling and should be prevented where possible, the APB believe that these areas should be quarantined after the conflict ends and that landmines should only be used in areas which are not urban or populated. |
| Date | 20:17:30, October 10, 2015 CET | From | Alorian Liberty Alliance (ALA) | To | Debating the Restriction of landmine use |
| Message | Would you agree for a compromise if we changed the legistation to "land mines are allowed but restricted"? |
| Date | 20:22:58, October 10, 2015 CET | From | Alorian Parti Bishopal (APB) | To | Debating the Restriction of landmine use |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We would endorse this bill if you were to make that amendment. |
| Date | 01:16:14, October 11, 2015 CET | From |  National People's Front (NPF) | To | Debating the Restriction of landmine use |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We stand by APB in supporting land mines are allowed but restricted. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 549 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 101 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
| Random quote: "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun... our principle is to have the Party control the gun and never allow the gun to control the Party." - Mao Zedong |