We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to Vote for the Formerly Incarcerated
Details
Submitted by[?]: Coalition for Unity and Prosperity
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3932
Description[?]:
The CUP believes those individuals who have undergone their assigned punishment and repaid their debt to society are to be viewed as exactly that -debt free- and insists National Policy reflect so. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Voting rights of criminals.
Old value:: The decision is left to the local governments.
Current: Criminals are always allowed to vote, regardless of whether they are in jail or not.
Proposed: Criminals released from jail are allowed to vote.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:48:13, November 03, 2015 CET | From | Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP) | To | Debating the Right to Vote for the Formerly Incarcerated |
Message | Local governments deserve the right to determine how to deal with their criminals. Our party is against giving rights to those who violate the rights of others - but we acknowledge the importance of local autonomy. We have decided to vote against this bill. |
Date | 05:56:58, November 04, 2015 CET | From | Coalition for Unity and Prosperity | To | Debating the Right to Vote for the Formerly Incarcerated |
Message | Indeed, no rights for those who violate the rights of others. An interesting thought, but one which the CUP denies as it logically leads to nothing short of violence and death against criminals. Indeed, the CUP insists that every person has a right to fair trial and humane treatment, which shall never be abrogated despite the crime or violation committed. |
Date | 14:18:29, November 04, 2015 CET | From | Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP) | To | Debating the Right to Vote for the Formerly Incarcerated |
Message | We agree, everyone deserves a fair trial. Criminals have already been charged and judged. You still have not provided justification for forcing your liberal degenerate policies on local authorities. |
Date | 16:04:36, November 04, 2015 CET | From | Coalition for Unity and Prosperity | To | Debating the Right to Vote for the Formerly Incarcerated |
Message | To be honest, the CUP finds strictly devolving every issue to "The decision is left to the local governments." to be frankly, boring. The CUP believes in discussion and comparing political beliefs, not talking to a drab wall with the same answer to every proposal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 433 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 317 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river." Nikita Khrushchev (1894 - 1971) |