We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: A Small Military Tweak
Details
Submitted by[?]: Amalgam Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2184
Description[?]:
Just a tweak to military service and a chance to ease up on nuclear weapon carelessness. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve either a term in the military or a lesser paid term of civilian national service, at their option.
Current: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:39:50, January 16, 2006 CET | From | Communist Party of Saridan | To | Debating the A Small Military Tweak |
Message | That isn't small at all. Take out Article 1 and you have my support. |
Date | 11:53:14, January 17, 2006 CET | From | Now And Zen Party | To | Debating the A Small Military Tweak |
Message | This joint is just like a yoyo.... We make changes, you reverse them, we make changes, you reverse them... Amalgam, stick with Dentistry. |
Date | 02:41:08, January 19, 2006 CET | From | Caleb Party | To | Debating the A Small Military Tweak |
Message | i dont like article 2. we shouldnt wait for us to get hit by a biological or chemical attack then we cant respond because we probably wont have nothing left. |
Date | 04:22:55, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Communist Party of Saridan | To | Debating the A Small Military Tweak |
Message | Won't have nothing=We will have something. Your argument is self-defeating. But, in seriousness, using chemical weapons or biological weapons will make our country as bad as a terrorist group. |
Date | 05:59:03, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Now And Zen Party | To | Debating the A Small Military Tweak |
Message | No, the difference is that we don't want to USE them, we just want to have them, as a visible deterrent. Terrorists WOULD use them, no matter what. |
Date | 02:45:32, January 25, 2006 CET | From | Christian Left Party | To | Debating the A Small Military Tweak |
Message | i agree with the second proposal, and beyond, but I don't like the first so I don't think i'll support. |
Date | 18:20:03, January 25, 2006 CET | From | The Green Hornet Party | To | Debating the A Small Military Tweak |
Message | We like article one but not article two. We need to have the weapons and be able to use them when and if needed. |
Date | 01:00:33, February 08, 2006 CET | From | Voter Apathy Party | To | Debating the A Small Military Tweak |
Message | Can we either kill bill or put to a vote? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 33 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 421 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 46 |
Random fact: Each user account may only be used by the player who set it up. Handing over an account to another player is not allowed. |
Random quote: "The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles." - Ayn Rand |