Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:16:04
Server time: 19:43:55, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: A Small Military Tweak

Details

Submitted by[?]: Amalgam Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2184

Description[?]:

Just a tweak to military service and a chance to ease up on nuclear weapon carelessness.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:39:50, January 16, 2006 CET
From Communist Party of Saridan
ToDebating the A Small Military Tweak
MessageThat isn't small at all. Take out Article 1 and you have my support.

Date11:53:14, January 17, 2006 CET
From Now And Zen Party
ToDebating the A Small Military Tweak
MessageThis joint is just like a yoyo....
We make changes, you reverse them, we make changes, you reverse them...
Amalgam, stick with Dentistry.

Date02:41:08, January 19, 2006 CET
From Caleb Party
ToDebating the A Small Military Tweak
Messagei dont like article 2. we shouldnt wait for us to get hit by a biological or chemical attack then we cant respond because we probably wont have nothing left.

Date04:22:55, January 22, 2006 CET
From Communist Party of Saridan
ToDebating the A Small Military Tweak
MessageWon't have nothing=We will have something.

Your argument is self-defeating.

But, in seriousness, using chemical weapons or biological weapons will make our country as bad as a terrorist group.

Date05:59:03, January 22, 2006 CET
From Now And Zen Party
ToDebating the A Small Military Tweak
MessageNo, the difference is that we don't want to USE them, we just want to have them, as a visible deterrent. Terrorists WOULD use them, no matter what.

Date02:45:32, January 25, 2006 CET
From Christian Left Party
ToDebating the A Small Military Tweak
Messagei agree with the second proposal, and beyond, but I don't like the first so I don't think i'll support.

Date18:20:03, January 25, 2006 CET
From The Green Hornet Party
ToDebating the A Small Military Tweak
MessageWe like article one but not article two. We need to have the weapons and be able to use them when and if needed.

Date01:00:33, February 08, 2006 CET
From Voter Apathy Party
ToDebating the A Small Military Tweak
MessageCan we either kill bill or put to a vote?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 33

no
    

Total Seats: 421

abstain
   

Total Seats: 46


Random fact: Each user account may only be used by the player who set it up. Handing over an account to another player is not allowed.

Random quote: "The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles." - Ayn Rand

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 79